Standard

Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram. / Popov, A. A.; Shubin, Yu V.; Plyusnin, P. E. et al.

In: Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 777, 10.03.2019, p. 204-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Popov, AA, Shubin, YV, Plyusnin, PE, Sharafutdinov, MR & Korenev, SV 2019, 'Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram', Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 777, pp. 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.332

APA

Vancouver

Popov AA, Shubin YV, Plyusnin PE, Sharafutdinov MR, Korenev SV. Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2019 Mar 10;777:204-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.332

Author

Popov, A. A. ; Shubin, Yu V. ; Plyusnin, P. E. et al. / Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram. In: Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2019 ; Vol. 777. pp. 204-212.

BibTeX

@article{2105abbeb3bf474395297033ce2e6b0f,
title = "Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram",
abstract = "The equilibrium Cu–Pd phase diagram has been experimentally reinvestigated in the 300–680 °C temperature region by powder XRD involving a high-temperature technique. To reduce the annealing time needed for the system to attain the equilibrium state, nanosized specimens with a characteristic crystallite size of 5–15 nm were used initially. All previously reported phases, i.e., a disordered face-centered cubic solid solution Cu1-xPdx (A1), a one-dimensional long-period superlattice structure Cu21Pd7 (1D–LPS), intermetallic compounds Cu3Pd (L12) and CuPd (B2), except a two-dimensional long-period superlattice structure (2D–LPS), could be confirmed. Homogeneity ranges of all solid phases existing in the Cu–Pd system were determined at distinct temperatures. The largest deviation of the solubility limits was observed for the Pd-rich boundary of the Cu3Pd region (25–30 at.% Pd) and the Cu-rich boundary of the Cu1-xPdx region in the compositional range >55 at.% Pd. Based on the present experimental results, the constitutional Cu–Pd diagram was modified.",
keywords = "Copper, Experimental X–ray study, Nanoalloys, Palladium, Phase diagram, TRANSFORMATION, PALLADIUM, MECHANISM, Experimental X-ray study, PD/CU ALLOY, MEMBRANES, STATE, TRANSITION, NANOPARTICLES, KINETICS, CATALYTIC-ACTIVITY",
author = "Popov, {A. A.} and Shubin, {Yu V.} and Plyusnin, {P. E.} and Sharafutdinov, {M. R.} and Korenev, {S. V.}",
year = "2019",
month = mar,
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.332",
language = "English",
volume = "777",
pages = "204--212",
journal = "Journal of Alloys and Compounds",
issn = "0925-8388",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental redetermination of the Cu–Pd phase diagram

AU - Popov, A. A.

AU - Shubin, Yu V.

AU - Plyusnin, P. E.

AU - Sharafutdinov, M. R.

AU - Korenev, S. V.

PY - 2019/3/10

Y1 - 2019/3/10

N2 - The equilibrium Cu–Pd phase diagram has been experimentally reinvestigated in the 300–680 °C temperature region by powder XRD involving a high-temperature technique. To reduce the annealing time needed for the system to attain the equilibrium state, nanosized specimens with a characteristic crystallite size of 5–15 nm were used initially. All previously reported phases, i.e., a disordered face-centered cubic solid solution Cu1-xPdx (A1), a one-dimensional long-period superlattice structure Cu21Pd7 (1D–LPS), intermetallic compounds Cu3Pd (L12) and CuPd (B2), except a two-dimensional long-period superlattice structure (2D–LPS), could be confirmed. Homogeneity ranges of all solid phases existing in the Cu–Pd system were determined at distinct temperatures. The largest deviation of the solubility limits was observed for the Pd-rich boundary of the Cu3Pd region (25–30 at.% Pd) and the Cu-rich boundary of the Cu1-xPdx region in the compositional range >55 at.% Pd. Based on the present experimental results, the constitutional Cu–Pd diagram was modified.

AB - The equilibrium Cu–Pd phase diagram has been experimentally reinvestigated in the 300–680 °C temperature region by powder XRD involving a high-temperature technique. To reduce the annealing time needed for the system to attain the equilibrium state, nanosized specimens with a characteristic crystallite size of 5–15 nm were used initially. All previously reported phases, i.e., a disordered face-centered cubic solid solution Cu1-xPdx (A1), a one-dimensional long-period superlattice structure Cu21Pd7 (1D–LPS), intermetallic compounds Cu3Pd (L12) and CuPd (B2), except a two-dimensional long-period superlattice structure (2D–LPS), could be confirmed. Homogeneity ranges of all solid phases existing in the Cu–Pd system were determined at distinct temperatures. The largest deviation of the solubility limits was observed for the Pd-rich boundary of the Cu3Pd region (25–30 at.% Pd) and the Cu-rich boundary of the Cu1-xPdx region in the compositional range >55 at.% Pd. Based on the present experimental results, the constitutional Cu–Pd diagram was modified.

KW - Copper

KW - Experimental X–ray study

KW - Nanoalloys

KW - Palladium

KW - Phase diagram

KW - TRANSFORMATION

KW - PALLADIUM

KW - MECHANISM

KW - Experimental X-ray study

KW - PD/CU ALLOY

KW - MEMBRANES

KW - STATE

KW - TRANSITION

KW - NANOPARTICLES

KW - KINETICS

KW - CATALYTIC-ACTIVITY

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056182118&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.332

DO - 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.332

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056182118

VL - 777

SP - 204

EP - 212

JO - Journal of Alloys and Compounds

JF - Journal of Alloys and Compounds

SN - 0925-8388

ER -

ID: 17409331