Standard

Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton). / Mekhonoshin, A. S.; Ernst, R.; Soderlund, U. et al.

In: Russian Geology and Geophysics, Vol. 57, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 822-833.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Mekhonoshin, AS, Ernst, R, Soderlund, U, Hamilton, MA, Kolotilina, TB, Izokh, AE, Polyakov, GV & Tolstykh, ND 2016, 'Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton)', Russian Geology and Geophysics, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 822-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020

APA

Mekhonoshin, A. S., Ernst, R., Soderlund, U., Hamilton, M. A., Kolotilina, T. B., Izokh, A. E., Polyakov, G. V., & Tolstykh, N. D. (2016). Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton). Russian Geology and Geophysics, 57(5), 822-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020

Vancouver

Mekhonoshin AS, Ernst R, Soderlund U, Hamilton MA, Kolotilina TB, Izokh AE et al. Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton). Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2016 May 1;57(5):822-833. doi: 10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020

Author

Mekhonoshin, A. S. ; Ernst, R. ; Soderlund, U. et al. / Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton). In: Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2016 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 822-833.

BibTeX

@article{0908c65c12ed45b7871974a75cd9f660,
title = "Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton)",
abstract = "This study aims at summarizing available geological and geochemical data on known Proterozoic platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic massifs in the south of Siberia. Considering new data on geochemistry and geochronology of some intrusions, it was feasible to compare ore-bearing complexes of different time spans and areas and to follow their relationships with the recognized large igneous provinces. In the south of Siberia, the platinum-bearing massifs might be united into three age groups: Late Paleoproterozoic (e.g., Chiney complex, Malozadoisky massif), Late Mesoproterozoic (e.g., Srednecheremshansky massif), and Neoproterozoic (e.g., Kingash complex, Yoko-Dovyren massif, and massifs in the center of the East Sayan Mts.). In most massifs but Chiney the initial magmas are magnesium-rich. On paleogeodynamic reconstructions, the position of the studied massifs is the evidence that three most precisely dated events in North Canada continued into southern Siberia: In the period 1880-1865 Ma, it was the Ghost-Mara River-Morel LIP; at 1270-1260 Ma, the Mackenzie LIP; and at 725-720 Ma, Franklin LIP. In Siberia, the mostly productive massifs with respect to PGE-Ni-Cu mineralization are those linked with the Franklin LIP: Verkhny Kingash, Yoko-Dovyren, and central part of the Eastern Sayan Mountains, e.g., Tartay, Zhelos, and Tokty-Oy.",
keywords = "Large igneous provinces, Mafic-ultramafic intrusions, PGE-Ni-Cu deposits",
author = "Mekhonoshin, {A. S.} and R. Ernst and U. Soderlund and Hamilton, {M. A.} and Kolotilina, {T. B.} and Izokh, {A. E.} and Polyakov, {G. V.} and Tolstykh, {N. D.}",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "822--833",
journal = "Russian Geology and Geophysics",
issn = "1068-7971",
publisher = "Elsevier Science B.V.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic intrusions and large igneous provinces (exemplified by the Siberian Craton)

AU - Mekhonoshin, A. S.

AU - Ernst, R.

AU - Soderlund, U.

AU - Hamilton, M. A.

AU - Kolotilina, T. B.

AU - Izokh, A. E.

AU - Polyakov, G. V.

AU - Tolstykh, N. D.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - This study aims at summarizing available geological and geochemical data on known Proterozoic platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic massifs in the south of Siberia. Considering new data on geochemistry and geochronology of some intrusions, it was feasible to compare ore-bearing complexes of different time spans and areas and to follow their relationships with the recognized large igneous provinces. In the south of Siberia, the platinum-bearing massifs might be united into three age groups: Late Paleoproterozoic (e.g., Chiney complex, Malozadoisky massif), Late Mesoproterozoic (e.g., Srednecheremshansky massif), and Neoproterozoic (e.g., Kingash complex, Yoko-Dovyren massif, and massifs in the center of the East Sayan Mts.). In most massifs but Chiney the initial magmas are magnesium-rich. On paleogeodynamic reconstructions, the position of the studied massifs is the evidence that three most precisely dated events in North Canada continued into southern Siberia: In the period 1880-1865 Ma, it was the Ghost-Mara River-Morel LIP; at 1270-1260 Ma, the Mackenzie LIP; and at 725-720 Ma, Franklin LIP. In Siberia, the mostly productive massifs with respect to PGE-Ni-Cu mineralization are those linked with the Franklin LIP: Verkhny Kingash, Yoko-Dovyren, and central part of the Eastern Sayan Mountains, e.g., Tartay, Zhelos, and Tokty-Oy.

AB - This study aims at summarizing available geological and geochemical data on known Proterozoic platinum-bearing ultramafic-mafic massifs in the south of Siberia. Considering new data on geochemistry and geochronology of some intrusions, it was feasible to compare ore-bearing complexes of different time spans and areas and to follow their relationships with the recognized large igneous provinces. In the south of Siberia, the platinum-bearing massifs might be united into three age groups: Late Paleoproterozoic (e.g., Chiney complex, Malozadoisky massif), Late Mesoproterozoic (e.g., Srednecheremshansky massif), and Neoproterozoic (e.g., Kingash complex, Yoko-Dovyren massif, and massifs in the center of the East Sayan Mts.). In most massifs but Chiney the initial magmas are magnesium-rich. On paleogeodynamic reconstructions, the position of the studied massifs is the evidence that three most precisely dated events in North Canada continued into southern Siberia: In the period 1880-1865 Ma, it was the Ghost-Mara River-Morel LIP; at 1270-1260 Ma, the Mackenzie LIP; and at 725-720 Ma, Franklin LIP. In Siberia, the mostly productive massifs with respect to PGE-Ni-Cu mineralization are those linked with the Franklin LIP: Verkhny Kingash, Yoko-Dovyren, and central part of the Eastern Sayan Mountains, e.g., Tartay, Zhelos, and Tokty-Oy.

KW - Large igneous provinces

KW - Mafic-ultramafic intrusions

KW - PGE-Ni-Cu deposits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969776630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020

DO - 10.1016/j.rgg.2015.09.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84969776630

VL - 57

SP - 822

EP - 833

JO - Russian Geology and Geophysics

JF - Russian Geology and Geophysics

SN - 1068-7971

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 25489170