Standard

Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data. / Konyukhov, Grigory; Yaskevich, Sergey.

In: Computational Geosciences, Vol. 28, No. 6, 12.2024, p. 1413–1424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Konyukhov G, Yaskevich S. Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data. Computational Geosciences. 2024 Dec;28(6):1413–1424. doi: 10.1007/s10596-024-10323-9

Author

Konyukhov, Grigory ; Yaskevich, Sergey. / Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data. In: Computational Geosciences. 2024 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 1413–1424.

BibTeX

@article{ed48d0b9724f44318fb7945b5d0c5160,
title = "Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data",
abstract = "Surface microseismic is a technique aimed at characterizing hydraulic fracturing or reservoir behavior by assessing mechanisms and locating micro-earthquakes related to the operations. Typically, a large number of receivers are used for observations, and migration operators are employed for surface microseismic data processing, which can be time-consuming. Inversion for source mechanism further adds to the computational burden as it involves scanning the space of source mechanism parameters through numerous summations. In this paper, we propose a two-step approach to microseismic data processing. Firstly, we apply a migration operator corresponding to the isotropic mechanism. Next, we utilize a neural network to process the migrated image and estimate the microseismic event location as well as the source mechanism. Our suggestion is to train the neural network using data transformations obtained through migration-based summation, resulting in images that capture specific patterns influenced by the location and source mechanism. To generate the training dataset, we compute surface gathers from sources with various locations and mechanisms, introduce Gaussian noise to distort them, and produce corresponding images. We evaluate the neural network using synthetic data distorted by real recorded noise and demonstrate its effectiveness in locating microseismic events and determining their mechanisms. Additionally, we analyze the limitations of this approach, including its sensitivity to noise and insensitivity to certain mechanisms{\textquoteright} orientations, such as ideal normal faults.",
keywords = "Artificial intelligence, Microseismic, Neural networks, Passive imaging, Passive seismic",
author = "Grigory Konyukhov and Sergey Yaskevich",
note = "The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project No 23-29-00201)",
year = "2024",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1007/s10596-024-10323-9",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1413–1424",
journal = "Computational Geosciences",
issn = "1420-0597",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural networks for source mechanism inversion from surface microseismic data

AU - Konyukhov, Grigory

AU - Yaskevich, Sergey

N1 - The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (project No 23-29-00201)

PY - 2024/12

Y1 - 2024/12

N2 - Surface microseismic is a technique aimed at characterizing hydraulic fracturing or reservoir behavior by assessing mechanisms and locating micro-earthquakes related to the operations. Typically, a large number of receivers are used for observations, and migration operators are employed for surface microseismic data processing, which can be time-consuming. Inversion for source mechanism further adds to the computational burden as it involves scanning the space of source mechanism parameters through numerous summations. In this paper, we propose a two-step approach to microseismic data processing. Firstly, we apply a migration operator corresponding to the isotropic mechanism. Next, we utilize a neural network to process the migrated image and estimate the microseismic event location as well as the source mechanism. Our suggestion is to train the neural network using data transformations obtained through migration-based summation, resulting in images that capture specific patterns influenced by the location and source mechanism. To generate the training dataset, we compute surface gathers from sources with various locations and mechanisms, introduce Gaussian noise to distort them, and produce corresponding images. We evaluate the neural network using synthetic data distorted by real recorded noise and demonstrate its effectiveness in locating microseismic events and determining their mechanisms. Additionally, we analyze the limitations of this approach, including its sensitivity to noise and insensitivity to certain mechanisms’ orientations, such as ideal normal faults.

AB - Surface microseismic is a technique aimed at characterizing hydraulic fracturing or reservoir behavior by assessing mechanisms and locating micro-earthquakes related to the operations. Typically, a large number of receivers are used for observations, and migration operators are employed for surface microseismic data processing, which can be time-consuming. Inversion for source mechanism further adds to the computational burden as it involves scanning the space of source mechanism parameters through numerous summations. In this paper, we propose a two-step approach to microseismic data processing. Firstly, we apply a migration operator corresponding to the isotropic mechanism. Next, we utilize a neural network to process the migrated image and estimate the microseismic event location as well as the source mechanism. Our suggestion is to train the neural network using data transformations obtained through migration-based summation, resulting in images that capture specific patterns influenced by the location and source mechanism. To generate the training dataset, we compute surface gathers from sources with various locations and mechanisms, introduce Gaussian noise to distort them, and produce corresponding images. We evaluate the neural network using synthetic data distorted by real recorded noise and demonstrate its effectiveness in locating microseismic events and determining their mechanisms. Additionally, we analyze the limitations of this approach, including its sensitivity to noise and insensitivity to certain mechanisms’ orientations, such as ideal normal faults.

KW - Artificial intelligence

KW - Microseismic

KW - Neural networks

KW - Passive imaging

KW - Passive seismic

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85207040252&origin=inward&txGid=182b26431f26b92e432f285e52a9f288

UR - https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001336258500001

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bf184dca-35f7-3a28-8ffb-76d2a678d51c/

U2 - 10.1007/s10596-024-10323-9

DO - 10.1007/s10596-024-10323-9

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1413

EP - 1424

JO - Computational Geosciences

JF - Computational Geosciences

SN - 1420-0597

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 61202005