Standard

INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD. / Debrenne, Michele; Rykim, Artyom; Sukhushina, Elena et al.

In: Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2022, p. 671-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Debrenne, M, Rykim, A, Sukhushina, E & Min, O 2022, 'INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD', Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 671-684. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684

APA

Debrenne, M., Rykim, A., Sukhushina, E., & Min, O. (2022). INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD. Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki, 20(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684

Vancouver

Debrenne M, Rykim A, Sukhushina E, Min O. INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD. Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki. 2022;20(4):671-684. doi: 10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684

Author

Debrenne, Michele ; Rykim, Artyom ; Sukhushina, Elena et al. / INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD. In: Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki. 2022 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 671-684.

BibTeX

@article{2e82d5a3e81b4daf9967a184e90f2c94,
title = "INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD",
abstract = "Approximately 15% of the world's population live with disabilities, which makes it the largest minority globally. At the same time, the access of persons with disabilities to higher education is extremely low7, ranging from 24% of students with disabilities vs. 36% of non-disabled ones in the EU to 0.63% of disabled individuals from the overall number of students in India. In this research, the existing strategies and practices of inclusive education are in¬vestigated and unsolved issues are identified based on the analysis of statistical data, international and national legislation that regulates relations of universi- ties with disabled personnel and students, university policies, reports of disability services, lawsuit cases, and academic and industry7 publications. This paper examines cases from the USA, where the percentage of students with disabilities is one of the world's highest, and France, which has a far lower rate of disabled students, but possesses developed institutional mecha¬nisms to protect their rights. The analysis is performed based on Tulane University (New Orleans), University of Bordeaux, and Ecole Polytechnique, which represent not only different university types, but also dissimilar disability policies. France and USA both show that attitudes to disability vary depend¬ing on a condition type. Society perceives the needs of individuals with visible disabilities as valid. However, it is wary of persons with psychiatric disabilities, whose explicit signs are not as obvious. The article concludes there are marked differences in protection of disabled persons∗ rights in France and the US regarding both mechanisms practices and outcomes, particularly, the access of students with disabilities to universities.",
keywords = "France, USA, inclusive higher education, protection of human rights, students with disabilities",
author = "Michele Debrenne and Artyom Rykim and Elena Sukhushina and Olga Min",
note = "Публикация для корректировки",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "671--684",
journal = "Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki",
issn = "1727-0634",
publisher = "Tsentr Social'noi Politiki i Gendernykh Issledovanii",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - INACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBILITY: ANALYSIS OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES ABROAD

AU - Debrenne, Michele

AU - Rykim, Artyom

AU - Sukhushina, Elena

AU - Min, Olga

N1 - Публикация для корректировки

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Approximately 15% of the world's population live with disabilities, which makes it the largest minority globally. At the same time, the access of persons with disabilities to higher education is extremely low7, ranging from 24% of students with disabilities vs. 36% of non-disabled ones in the EU to 0.63% of disabled individuals from the overall number of students in India. In this research, the existing strategies and practices of inclusive education are in¬vestigated and unsolved issues are identified based on the analysis of statistical data, international and national legislation that regulates relations of universi- ties with disabled personnel and students, university policies, reports of disability services, lawsuit cases, and academic and industry7 publications. This paper examines cases from the USA, where the percentage of students with disabilities is one of the world's highest, and France, which has a far lower rate of disabled students, but possesses developed institutional mecha¬nisms to protect their rights. The analysis is performed based on Tulane University (New Orleans), University of Bordeaux, and Ecole Polytechnique, which represent not only different university types, but also dissimilar disability policies. France and USA both show that attitudes to disability vary depend¬ing on a condition type. Society perceives the needs of individuals with visible disabilities as valid. However, it is wary of persons with psychiatric disabilities, whose explicit signs are not as obvious. The article concludes there are marked differences in protection of disabled persons∗ rights in France and the US regarding both mechanisms practices and outcomes, particularly, the access of students with disabilities to universities.

AB - Approximately 15% of the world's population live with disabilities, which makes it the largest minority globally. At the same time, the access of persons with disabilities to higher education is extremely low7, ranging from 24% of students with disabilities vs. 36% of non-disabled ones in the EU to 0.63% of disabled individuals from the overall number of students in India. In this research, the existing strategies and practices of inclusive education are in¬vestigated and unsolved issues are identified based on the analysis of statistical data, international and national legislation that regulates relations of universi- ties with disabled personnel and students, university policies, reports of disability services, lawsuit cases, and academic and industry7 publications. This paper examines cases from the USA, where the percentage of students with disabilities is one of the world's highest, and France, which has a far lower rate of disabled students, but possesses developed institutional mecha¬nisms to protect their rights. The analysis is performed based on Tulane University (New Orleans), University of Bordeaux, and Ecole Polytechnique, which represent not only different university types, but also dissimilar disability policies. France and USA both show that attitudes to disability vary depend¬ing on a condition type. Society perceives the needs of individuals with visible disabilities as valid. However, it is wary of persons with psychiatric disabilities, whose explicit signs are not as obvious. The article concludes there are marked differences in protection of disabled persons∗ rights in France and the US regarding both mechanisms practices and outcomes, particularly, the access of students with disabilities to universities.

KW - France

KW - USA

KW - inclusive higher education

KW - protection of human rights

KW - students with disabilities

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/7b991449-3b4b-3520-bdb2-05a176dbe34a/

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148908161&origin=inward&txGid=370985f8724a4779c99de8a5ad020892

U2 - 10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684

DO - 10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-4-671-684

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 671

EP - 684

JO - Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki

JF - Zhurnal Issledovanii Sotsial'noi Politiki

SN - 1727-0634

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 55693919