Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review
How a phase image of a cell with nucleus refractive index smaller than that of the cytoplasm should look like? A Comment on two papers by Steelman et al. and Schürmann et al. Read the Responses to this Comment: e201800091 and e201800095. / Yurkin, Maxim A.
In: Journal of Biophotonics, Vol. 11, No. 6, e201800033, 01.06.2018.Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - How a phase image of a cell with nucleus refractive index smaller than that of the cytoplasm should look like?
T2 - A Comment on two papers by Steelman et al. and Schürmann et al. Read the Responses to this Comment: e201800091 and e201800095
AU - Yurkin, Maxim A.
N1 - © 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - In recent papers Steelman et al. ("Is the nuclear refractive index lower than cytoplasm? Validation of phase measurements and implications for light scattering technologies") and Schürmann et al. ("Cell nuclei have lower refractive index and mass density than cytoplasm") obtained quantitative phase images of whole cells of various types and corresponding isolated nuclei and concluded that the refractive index (RI) of the nucleus is significantly smaller than that of the cytoplasm. The comment shows that this conclusion and assumptions used in retrieving the RI necessarily imply a characteristic dip in the center of the whole-cell phase images. This dip is not present in any of the phase images in the discussed papers, which is a strong argument against the conclusion of smaller nucleus RI. It is also discussed whether a different processing of the phase images can help to clarify this issue.
AB - In recent papers Steelman et al. ("Is the nuclear refractive index lower than cytoplasm? Validation of phase measurements and implications for light scattering technologies") and Schürmann et al. ("Cell nuclei have lower refractive index and mass density than cytoplasm") obtained quantitative phase images of whole cells of various types and corresponding isolated nuclei and concluded that the refractive index (RI) of the nucleus is significantly smaller than that of the cytoplasm. The comment shows that this conclusion and assumptions used in retrieving the RI necessarily imply a characteristic dip in the center of the whole-cell phase images. This dip is not present in any of the phase images in the discussed papers, which is a strong argument against the conclusion of smaller nucleus RI. It is also discussed whether a different processing of the phase images can help to clarify this issue.
KW - Light scattering
KW - Microscopy
KW - Nucleus
KW - Phase imaging
KW - Refractive index
KW - nucleus
KW - light scattering
KW - microscopy
KW - refractive index
KW - phase imaging
KW - Refractometry
KW - Cell Nucleus
KW - Cytoplasm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046363137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jbio.201800033
DO - 10.1002/jbio.201800033
M3 - Letter
C2 - 29722164
AN - SCOPUS:85046363137
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Biophotonics
JF - Journal of Biophotonics
SN - 1864-063X
IS - 6
M1 - e201800033
ER -
ID: 13072495