Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review
An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. / Downs, Timothy J.; Golovko, Nikita.
ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. ed. / WL Filho; L Brandli. Springer International Publishing AG, 2016. p. 77-92 (World Sustainability Series).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Research › peer-review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst
AU - Downs, Timothy J.
AU - Golovko, Nikita
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The University is poised to serve as the catalyst for an integrated, multi-sectoral, multi-scale approach that builds the requisite collective social and technical capacities of primary stakeholders to enable 2nd generation sustainable development (SD2.0). A synthesis of empirical evidence will be used to inform and justify a new integrative framework to design local and regional-scale projects, informed by the UN's SD21 Sustainable Development for the 21st Century report and the post-Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) era. It will also be used to situate "education for sustainable development"-the theme of this book-in the integrative framework, to navigate the degree to which other additional components/aspects need to be considered for education to be impactful at the systems level. The framework involves five main axes of integration within which the University's role is shown to be central and catalytic: (1) socio-political stakeholder interests and influences; (2) development sectors (e.g. water, energy, health, food, the economy and climate resilience); (3) knowledge types (scientific and indigenous); (4) socio-technical capacities, including-but not limited to-education, research and information resources; and (5) connections among sites with SD2.0 projects, forming an innovation network. This process recognizes integration and social innovation to be primary for success, technology secondary, and education to be but one key component. We argue that this integrative approach does not require a reshaping of the University's primary role-as others have argued-rather an amplification of its commitments and responsibilities. By integrating within and across these five dimensions during the design phase for projects, programs, and formal curricula, a new path to transformational sustainability emerges practical and compelling. Three illustrative examples of SD2.0 work are given.
AB - The University is poised to serve as the catalyst for an integrated, multi-sectoral, multi-scale approach that builds the requisite collective social and technical capacities of primary stakeholders to enable 2nd generation sustainable development (SD2.0). A synthesis of empirical evidence will be used to inform and justify a new integrative framework to design local and regional-scale projects, informed by the UN's SD21 Sustainable Development for the 21st Century report and the post-Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) era. It will also be used to situate "education for sustainable development"-the theme of this book-in the integrative framework, to navigate the degree to which other additional components/aspects need to be considered for education to be impactful at the systems level. The framework involves five main axes of integration within which the University's role is shown to be central and catalytic: (1) socio-political stakeholder interests and influences; (2) development sectors (e.g. water, energy, health, food, the economy and climate resilience); (3) knowledge types (scientific and indigenous); (4) socio-technical capacities, including-but not limited to-education, research and information resources; and (5) connections among sites with SD2.0 projects, forming an innovation network. This process recognizes integration and social innovation to be primary for success, technology secondary, and education to be but one key component. We argue that this integrative approach does not require a reshaping of the University's primary role-as others have argued-rather an amplification of its commitments and responsibilities. By integrating within and across these five dimensions during the design phase for projects, programs, and formal curricula, a new path to transformational sustainability emerges practical and compelling. Three illustrative examples of SD2.0 work are given.
KW - Integration
KW - Capacity building
KW - Socio-technical innovation
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6
M3 - Chapter
SN - 978-3-319-26732-6
T3 - World Sustainability Series
SP - 77
EP - 92
BT - ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL
A2 - Filho, WL
A2 - Brandli, L
PB - Springer International Publishing AG
ER -
ID: 34920030