Standard

An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. / Downs, Timothy J.; Golovko, Nikita.

ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. ed. / WL Filho; L Brandli. Springer International Publishing AG, 2016. p. 77-92 (World Sustainability Series).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Downs, TJ & Golovko, N 2016, An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. in WL Filho & L Brandli (eds), ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. World Sustainability Series, Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6

APA

Downs, T. J., & Golovko, N. (2016). An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. In WL. Filho, & L. Brandli (Eds.), ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL (pp. 77-92). (World Sustainability Series). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6

Vancouver

Downs TJ, Golovko N. An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. In Filho WL, Brandli L, editors, ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. Springer International Publishing AG. 2016. p. 77-92. (World Sustainability Series). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6

Author

Downs, Timothy J. ; Golovko, Nikita. / An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst. ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL. editor / WL Filho ; L Brandli. Springer International Publishing AG, 2016. pp. 77-92 (World Sustainability Series).

BibTeX

@inbook{bce710f376b14435ae6f6694e9b59035,
title = "An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst",
abstract = "The University is poised to serve as the catalyst for an integrated, multi-sectoral, multi-scale approach that builds the requisite collective social and technical capacities of primary stakeholders to enable 2nd generation sustainable development (SD2.0). A synthesis of empirical evidence will be used to inform and justify a new integrative framework to design local and regional-scale projects, informed by the UN's SD21 Sustainable Development for the 21st Century report and the post-Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) era. It will also be used to situate {"}education for sustainable development{"}-the theme of this book-in the integrative framework, to navigate the degree to which other additional components/aspects need to be considered for education to be impactful at the systems level. The framework involves five main axes of integration within which the University's role is shown to be central and catalytic: (1) socio-political stakeholder interests and influences; (2) development sectors (e.g. water, energy, health, food, the economy and climate resilience); (3) knowledge types (scientific and indigenous); (4) socio-technical capacities, including-but not limited to-education, research and information resources; and (5) connections among sites with SD2.0 projects, forming an innovation network. This process recognizes integration and social innovation to be primary for success, technology secondary, and education to be but one key component. We argue that this integrative approach does not require a reshaping of the University's primary role-as others have argued-rather an amplification of its commitments and responsibilities. By integrating within and across these five dimensions during the design phase for projects, programs, and formal curricula, a new path to transformational sustainability emerges practical and compelling. Three illustrative examples of SD2.0 work are given.",
keywords = "Integration, Capacity building, Socio-technical innovation",
author = "Downs, {Timothy J.} and Nikita Golovko",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-26732-6",
series = "World Sustainability Series",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
pages = "77--92",
editor = "WL Filho and L Brandli",
booktitle = "ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL",
address = "Switzerland",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - An Integrative Framework for Re-thinking 2nd Generation Sustainable Development (SD2.0) Projects, Education and the University as Catalyst

AU - Downs, Timothy J.

AU - Golovko, Nikita

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The University is poised to serve as the catalyst for an integrated, multi-sectoral, multi-scale approach that builds the requisite collective social and technical capacities of primary stakeholders to enable 2nd generation sustainable development (SD2.0). A synthesis of empirical evidence will be used to inform and justify a new integrative framework to design local and regional-scale projects, informed by the UN's SD21 Sustainable Development for the 21st Century report and the post-Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) era. It will also be used to situate "education for sustainable development"-the theme of this book-in the integrative framework, to navigate the degree to which other additional components/aspects need to be considered for education to be impactful at the systems level. The framework involves five main axes of integration within which the University's role is shown to be central and catalytic: (1) socio-political stakeholder interests and influences; (2) development sectors (e.g. water, energy, health, food, the economy and climate resilience); (3) knowledge types (scientific and indigenous); (4) socio-technical capacities, including-but not limited to-education, research and information resources; and (5) connections among sites with SD2.0 projects, forming an innovation network. This process recognizes integration and social innovation to be primary for success, technology secondary, and education to be but one key component. We argue that this integrative approach does not require a reshaping of the University's primary role-as others have argued-rather an amplification of its commitments and responsibilities. By integrating within and across these five dimensions during the design phase for projects, programs, and formal curricula, a new path to transformational sustainability emerges practical and compelling. Three illustrative examples of SD2.0 work are given.

AB - The University is poised to serve as the catalyst for an integrated, multi-sectoral, multi-scale approach that builds the requisite collective social and technical capacities of primary stakeholders to enable 2nd generation sustainable development (SD2.0). A synthesis of empirical evidence will be used to inform and justify a new integrative framework to design local and regional-scale projects, informed by the UN's SD21 Sustainable Development for the 21st Century report and the post-Millennium Development Goals (2000-2015) era. It will also be used to situate "education for sustainable development"-the theme of this book-in the integrative framework, to navigate the degree to which other additional components/aspects need to be considered for education to be impactful at the systems level. The framework involves five main axes of integration within which the University's role is shown to be central and catalytic: (1) socio-political stakeholder interests and influences; (2) development sectors (e.g. water, energy, health, food, the economy and climate resilience); (3) knowledge types (scientific and indigenous); (4) socio-technical capacities, including-but not limited to-education, research and information resources; and (5) connections among sites with SD2.0 projects, forming an innovation network. This process recognizes integration and social innovation to be primary for success, technology secondary, and education to be but one key component. We argue that this integrative approach does not require a reshaping of the University's primary role-as others have argued-rather an amplification of its commitments and responsibilities. By integrating within and across these five dimensions during the design phase for projects, programs, and formal curricula, a new path to transformational sustainability emerges practical and compelling. Three illustrative examples of SD2.0 work are given.

KW - Integration

KW - Capacity building

KW - Socio-technical innovation

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-26734-0_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-26732-6

T3 - World Sustainability Series

SP - 77

EP - 92

BT - ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL

A2 - Filho, WL

A2 - Brandli, L

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

ER -

ID: 34920030