Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition. / Hume, Samuel; Dianov, Grigory L.; Ramadan, Kristijan.
In: Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 48, No. 22, 16.12.2020, p. 12483-12501.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition
AU - Hume, Samuel
AU - Dianov, Grigory L.
AU - Ramadan, Kristijan
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research. Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/16
Y1 - 2020/12/16
N2 - Efficient S phase entry is essential for development, tissue repair, and immune defences. However, hyperactive or expedited S phase entry causes replication stress, DNA damage and oncogenesis, highlighting the need for strict regulation. Recent paradigm shifts and conflicting reports demonstrate the requirement for a discussion of the G1/S transition literature. Here, we review the recent studies, and propose a unified model for the S phase entry decision. In this model, competition between mitogen and DNA damage signalling over the course of the mother cell cycle constitutes the predominant control mechanism for S phase entry of daughter cells. Mitogens and DNA damage have distinct sensing periods, giving rise to three Commitment Points for S phase entry (CP1-3). S phase entry is mitogen-independent in the daughter G1 phase, but remains sensitive to DNA damage, such as single strand breaks, the most frequently-occurring lesions that uniquely threaten DNA replication. To control CP1-3, dedicated hubs integrate the antagonistic mitogenic and DNA damage signals, regulating the stoichiometric cyclin: CDK inhibitor ratio for ultrasensitive control of CDK4/6 and CDK2. This unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition combines the findings of decades of study, and provides an updated foundation for cell cycle research.
AB - Efficient S phase entry is essential for development, tissue repair, and immune defences. However, hyperactive or expedited S phase entry causes replication stress, DNA damage and oncogenesis, highlighting the need for strict regulation. Recent paradigm shifts and conflicting reports demonstrate the requirement for a discussion of the G1/S transition literature. Here, we review the recent studies, and propose a unified model for the S phase entry decision. In this model, competition between mitogen and DNA damage signalling over the course of the mother cell cycle constitutes the predominant control mechanism for S phase entry of daughter cells. Mitogens and DNA damage have distinct sensing periods, giving rise to three Commitment Points for S phase entry (CP1-3). S phase entry is mitogen-independent in the daughter G1 phase, but remains sensitive to DNA damage, such as single strand breaks, the most frequently-occurring lesions that uniquely threaten DNA replication. To control CP1-3, dedicated hubs integrate the antagonistic mitogenic and DNA damage signals, regulating the stoichiometric cyclin: CDK inhibitor ratio for ultrasensitive control of CDK4/6 and CDK2. This unified model for the G1/S cell cycle transition combines the findings of decades of study, and provides an updated foundation for cell cycle research.
KW - Cell Cycle/genetics
KW - Cell Cycle Checkpoints/genetics
KW - Cell Division/genetics
KW - DNA Damage/genetics
KW - DNA Replication/genetics
KW - G1 Phase/genetics
KW - Humans
KW - S Phase/genetics
KW - Signal Transduction/genetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098531866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/nar/gkaa1002
DO - 10.1093/nar/gkaa1002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33166394
AN - SCOPUS:85098531866
VL - 48
SP - 12483
EP - 12501
JO - Nucleic Acids Research
JF - Nucleic Acids Research
SN - 0305-1048
IS - 22
ER -
ID: 27357524