Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Validation of the Russian-language version of the ethics position questionnaire. / Fedorov, A. A.; Badiev, I. V.
в: Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics, Том 15, № 3, 01.01.2018, стр. 491-509.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the Russian-language version of the ethics position questionnaire
AU - Fedorov, A. A.
AU - Badiev, I. V.
N1 - Фёдоров А.А., Бадиев И.В. Валидизация русскоязычной версии опросника этических позиций // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. - 2018. - Т. 15. - № 3. - С. 491–509
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - The results of validation of the Russian version of D.R. Forsyth's Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) are presented. The original version of the questionnaire contains two orthogonal factors (idealism and relativism) that form the basis of taxonomy of ethical positions (situationism, absolutism, subjectivism and exceptionism). The article suggests that idealism and relativism should be considered as behavioral dispositions. In this study, several theoretical models have been verified by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The CFA revealed that a twolevel structural model where idealism and relativism are orthogonal second-order factors has the best fit. Idealism includes such factors as focus on reducing harm (II) and concern for good (12), and relativism includes such factors as relativity of ethic systems (Rl), interpersonal relativism (R2) and veracity (R3). The received model has a number of advantages. First, it fully corresponds to the theoretical model of D. R. Forsyth, including the orthogonality of the main factors. Secondly, it assumes the multidimensionality of the constructs "idealism" and "relativism." Thirdly, it allows to reconcile the results of previous empirical studies. The research established that the EPQ has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant and nomological validity. The latter was evaluated within the nomological network in which idealism and relativism were correlated with constructs associated with the value system (within the Sh. Schwartz theory of basic values). The results make it possible to consider the Russian version of the EPQ as a reliable and valid instrument of assessment of idealism and relativism.
AB - The results of validation of the Russian version of D.R. Forsyth's Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) are presented. The original version of the questionnaire contains two orthogonal factors (idealism and relativism) that form the basis of taxonomy of ethical positions (situationism, absolutism, subjectivism and exceptionism). The article suggests that idealism and relativism should be considered as behavioral dispositions. In this study, several theoretical models have been verified by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The CFA revealed that a twolevel structural model where idealism and relativism are orthogonal second-order factors has the best fit. Idealism includes such factors as focus on reducing harm (II) and concern for good (12), and relativism includes such factors as relativity of ethic systems (Rl), interpersonal relativism (R2) and veracity (R3). The received model has a number of advantages. First, it fully corresponds to the theoretical model of D. R. Forsyth, including the orthogonality of the main factors. Secondly, it assumes the multidimensionality of the constructs "idealism" and "relativism." Thirdly, it allows to reconcile the results of previous empirical studies. The research established that the EPQ has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant and nomological validity. The latter was evaluated within the nomological network in which idealism and relativism were correlated with constructs associated with the value system (within the Sh. Schwartz theory of basic values). The results make it possible to consider the Russian version of the EPQ as a reliable and valid instrument of assessment of idealism and relativism.
KW - Disposition
KW - Ethics positions
KW - Idealism
KW - Morality
KW - Relativism
KW - replication
KW - disposition
KW - idealism
KW - ethics positions
KW - morality
KW - reproducibility
KW - relativism
KW - FIT INDEXES
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056548358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37152418
U2 - 10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-491-509
DO - 10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-491-509
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85056548358
VL - 15
SP - 491
EP - 509
JO - Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics
JF - Psychology, Journal of the Higher School of Economics
SN - 1813-8918
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 17470970