TY - JOUR

T1 - TMAO and urea in the hydration shell of the protein SNase

AU - Smolin, Nikolai

AU - Voloshin, Vladimir P.

AU - Anikeenko, Alexey V.

AU - Geiger, Alfons

AU - Winter, Roland

AU - Medvedev, Nikolai N.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - We performed all-atom MD simulations of the protein SNase in aqueous solution and in the presence of two major osmolytes, trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and urea, as cosolvents at various concentrations and compositions and at different pressures and temperatures. The distributions of the cosolvent molecules and their orientation in the surroundings of the protein were analyzed in great detail. The distribution of urea is largely conserved near the protein. It varies little with pressure and temperature, and does practically not depend on the addition of TMAO. The slight decrease with temperature of the number of urea molecules that are in contact with the SNase molecule is consistent with the view that the interaction of the protein with urea is mainly of enthalpic nature. Most of the TMAO molecules tend to be oriented to the protein by its methyl groups, a small amount of these molecules contact the protein by its oxygen, forming hydrogen bonds with the protein, only. Unlike urea, the fraction of TMAO in the hydration shell of SNase slightly increases with temperature (a signature of a prevailing hydrophobic interaction between TMAO and SNase), and decreases significantly upon the addition of urea. This behavior reflects the diverse nature of the interaction of the two osmolytes with the protein. Using the Voronoi volume of the atoms of the solvent molecules (water, urea, TMAO), we compared the fraction of the volume occupied by a given type of solvent molecule in the hydration shell and in the bulk solvent. The volume fraction of urea in the hydration shell is more than two times larger than in the bulk, whereas the volume fraction of TMAO in the hydration shell is only slightly larger in the binary solvent (TMAO + water) and becomes even less than in the bulk in the ternary solvent (TMAO + water + urea). Thus, TMAO tends to be excluded from the hydration shell of the protein. The behavior of the two cosolvents in the vicinity of the protein does not change much with pressure (from 1 to 5000 bar) and temperature (from 280 to 330 K). This is also in line with the conception of the "osmophobic effect" of TMAO to protect proteins from denaturation also at harsh environmental conditions. We also calculated the volumetric parameters of SNase and found that the cosolvents have a small but significant effect on the apparent volume and its contributions, i.e. the intrinsic, molecular and thermal volumes.

AB - We performed all-atom MD simulations of the protein SNase in aqueous solution and in the presence of two major osmolytes, trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) and urea, as cosolvents at various concentrations and compositions and at different pressures and temperatures. The distributions of the cosolvent molecules and their orientation in the surroundings of the protein were analyzed in great detail. The distribution of urea is largely conserved near the protein. It varies little with pressure and temperature, and does practically not depend on the addition of TMAO. The slight decrease with temperature of the number of urea molecules that are in contact with the SNase molecule is consistent with the view that the interaction of the protein with urea is mainly of enthalpic nature. Most of the TMAO molecules tend to be oriented to the protein by its methyl groups, a small amount of these molecules contact the protein by its oxygen, forming hydrogen bonds with the protein, only. Unlike urea, the fraction of TMAO in the hydration shell of SNase slightly increases with temperature (a signature of a prevailing hydrophobic interaction between TMAO and SNase), and decreases significantly upon the addition of urea. This behavior reflects the diverse nature of the interaction of the two osmolytes with the protein. Using the Voronoi volume of the atoms of the solvent molecules (water, urea, TMAO), we compared the fraction of the volume occupied by a given type of solvent molecule in the hydration shell and in the bulk solvent. The volume fraction of urea in the hydration shell is more than two times larger than in the bulk, whereas the volume fraction of TMAO in the hydration shell is only slightly larger in the binary solvent (TMAO + water) and becomes even less than in the bulk in the ternary solvent (TMAO + water + urea). Thus, TMAO tends to be excluded from the hydration shell of the protein. The behavior of the two cosolvents in the vicinity of the protein does not change much with pressure (from 1 to 5000 bar) and temperature (from 280 to 330 K). This is also in line with the conception of the "osmophobic effect" of TMAO to protect proteins from denaturation also at harsh environmental conditions. We also calculated the volumetric parameters of SNase and found that the cosolvents have a small but significant effect on the apparent volume and its contributions, i.e. the intrinsic, molecular and thermal volumes.

KW - Methylamines/chemistry

KW - Micrococcal Nuclease/chemistry

KW - Molecular Dynamics Simulation

KW - Solvents/chemistry

KW - Temperature

KW - Urea/chemistry

KW - Water/chemistry

KW - PREFERENTIAL INTERACTIONS

KW - TRIMETHYLAMINE-N-OXIDE

KW - MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS

KW - STABILIZING OSMOLYTES

KW - PARTICLE MESH EWALD

KW - VOLUMETRIC PROPERTIES

KW - HYDROPHOBIC HYDRATION

KW - FORCE-FIELD

KW - VIBRATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY

KW - WATER-STRUCTURE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027007321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c6cp07903b

DO - 10.1039/c6cp07903b

M3 - Article

C2 - 28116386

AN - SCOPUS:85027007321

VL - 19

SP - 6345

EP - 6357

JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

SN - 1463-9076

IS - 9

ER -