Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
The influence of heterogeneous proppant pack on fracture closure and productivity. / Skopintsev, A. M.; Dontsov, E. V.; Baykin, A. N. и др.
в: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Том 214, 110494, 07.2022.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of heterogeneous proppant pack on fracture closure and productivity
AU - Skopintsev, A. M.
AU - Dontsov, E. V.
AU - Baykin, A. N.
AU - Golovin, S. V.
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to acknowledge support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the Grant No. 14.W03.31.0002 . Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Even though hydraulic fracturing is a common and well adopted well stimulation method in petroleum industry, there are still open scientific questions in the area, mainly due to complexity of the phenomena involved in the process. In this paper, we particularly address the problem of fracture closure and productivity in situations, when proppant distribution inside the fracture is strongly heterogeneous. This can happen, for instance, during pulsed injection, in which a pulse of clean fluid is alternated with a pulse of slurry with proppant. Such a combination leads to Saffman–Taylor instability and, consequently, to spatially heterogeneous distribution of proppant. To address the problem, a coupled hydraulic fracturing and proppant transport model is utilized to simulate proppant placement in a fracture. After that, a three-dimensional finite element model is used to compute fracture closure and fluid inflow or productivity. Several numerical examples with various pumping schedules are presented to better understand the influence of proppant heterogeneity on fracture closure and the resulting production. In addition, to get insights about the observed behavior, an analytical model for fracture closure between two proppant pillars is presented. The model provides a single dimensionless parameter that quantifies the degree of fracture closure between the pillars of proppant. Numerical results are analyzed and discussed in relation to this dimensionless number.
AB - Even though hydraulic fracturing is a common and well adopted well stimulation method in petroleum industry, there are still open scientific questions in the area, mainly due to complexity of the phenomena involved in the process. In this paper, we particularly address the problem of fracture closure and productivity in situations, when proppant distribution inside the fracture is strongly heterogeneous. This can happen, for instance, during pulsed injection, in which a pulse of clean fluid is alternated with a pulse of slurry with proppant. Such a combination leads to Saffman–Taylor instability and, consequently, to spatially heterogeneous distribution of proppant. To address the problem, a coupled hydraulic fracturing and proppant transport model is utilized to simulate proppant placement in a fracture. After that, a three-dimensional finite element model is used to compute fracture closure and fluid inflow or productivity. Several numerical examples with various pumping schedules are presented to better understand the influence of proppant heterogeneity on fracture closure and the resulting production. In addition, to get insights about the observed behavior, an analytical model for fracture closure between two proppant pillars is presented. The model provides a single dimensionless parameter that quantifies the degree of fracture closure between the pillars of proppant. Numerical results are analyzed and discussed in relation to this dimensionless number.
KW - Fracture closure
KW - Hydraulic fracture permeability
KW - Proppant distribution
KW - Saffman–Taylor instability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129458546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/bacc92a1-d74f-3b93-b30e-dfdd415cf8a5/
U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110494
DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110494
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129458546
VL - 214
JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
SN - 0920-4105
M1 - 110494
ER -
ID: 36062013