The effect of near-surface azimuthal anisotropy on a joint interpretation of seismic and electrical resistivity data

Standard

The effect of near-surface azimuthal anisotropy on a joint interpretation of seismic and electrical resistivity data. / Yaskevich, Sergey V.; Dergach, Petr A.; Chernyshov, Gleb S. и др.

в: Near Surface Geophysics, Том 20, № 3, 06.2022, стр. 279-291.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование

BibTeX

@article{172af9db929c49f5a65d57d071c2efd8,

title = "The effect of near-surface azimuthal anisotropy on a joint interpretation of seismic and electrical resistivity data",

abstract = "In this paper, we study the anisotropic near surface with seismic refraction surveying and electrical resistivity tomography. We present a field data processing case study and show a significant dependence of the determined P- wave velocity and electrical resistivity on the acquisition line direction. We show that the anisotropy influences not only the determined velocities themselves, but also the estimated depths of the determined boundaries and can cause misinterpretation of the arrival time curves and lead to hidden layer issues. We justify our field data-processing results with ray modelling and synthetic data processing. As a result of our case study, we suggest a consistent direction of anisotropy for electrical resistivity and seismic surveying for the particular site in the Novosibirsk region.",

keywords = "electrical resistivity tomography, modelling, near-surface, seismic, velocity",

author = "Yaskevich, {Sergey V.} and Dergach, {Petr A.} and Chernyshov, {Gleb S.} and Nevedrova, {Nina N.} and Aidisa Sanchaa and Shalaginov, {Alexander E.} and Duchkov, {Anton A.} and Gorshkalev, {Sergey B.} and Wladimir Karsten",

note = "Funding Information: The authors greatly appreciate the comments of the two reviewers, Dr. Bing Zhou and Dr. Joao Carvalho and the anonymous Reviewer who helped in improving the paper. The work is supported by projects of fundamental research 0331‐2019‐0009 and 0331‐2019‐0015. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.",

year = "2022",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1002/nsg.12206",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "279--291",

journal = "Near Surface Geophysics",

issn = "1569-4445",

publisher = "EAGE Publishing BV",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of near-surface azimuthal anisotropy on a joint interpretation of seismic and electrical resistivity data

AU - Yaskevich, Sergey V.

AU - Dergach, Petr A.

AU - Chernyshov, Gleb S.

AU - Nevedrova, Nina N.

AU - Sanchaa, Aidisa

AU - Shalaginov, Alexander E.

AU - Duchkov, Anton A.

AU - Gorshkalev, Sergey B.

AU - Karsten, Wladimir

N1 - Funding Information: The authors greatly appreciate the comments of the two reviewers, Dr. Bing Zhou and Dr. Joao Carvalho and the anonymous Reviewer who helped in improving the paper. The work is supported by projects of fundamental research 0331‐2019‐0009 and 0331‐2019‐0015. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - In this paper, we study the anisotropic near surface with seismic refraction surveying and electrical resistivity tomography. We present a field data processing case study and show a significant dependence of the determined P- wave velocity and electrical resistivity on the acquisition line direction. We show that the anisotropy influences not only the determined velocities themselves, but also the estimated depths of the determined boundaries and can cause misinterpretation of the arrival time curves and lead to hidden layer issues. We justify our field data-processing results with ray modelling and synthetic data processing. As a result of our case study, we suggest a consistent direction of anisotropy for electrical resistivity and seismic surveying for the particular site in the Novosibirsk region.

AB - In this paper, we study the anisotropic near surface with seismic refraction surveying and electrical resistivity tomography. We present a field data processing case study and show a significant dependence of the determined P- wave velocity and electrical resistivity on the acquisition line direction. We show that the anisotropy influences not only the determined velocities themselves, but also the estimated depths of the determined boundaries and can cause misinterpretation of the arrival time curves and lead to hidden layer issues. We justify our field data-processing results with ray modelling and synthetic data processing. As a result of our case study, we suggest a consistent direction of anisotropy for electrical resistivity and seismic surveying for the particular site in the Novosibirsk region.

KW - electrical resistivity tomography

KW - modelling

KW - near-surface

KW - seismic

KW - velocity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127500893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/nsg.12206

DO - 10.1002/nsg.12206

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85127500893

VL - 20

SP - 279

EP - 291

JO - Near Surface Geophysics

JF - Near Surface Geophysics

SN - 1569-4445

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 35840640