Structure of Russian publications in clinical immunology and allergology (Journal Articles, Clinical Trials, Meta-Analyses and Practice Guidelines) in comparison with other Brics Countries in 2008-2015

Standard

Structure of Russian publications in clinical immunology and allergology (Journal Articles, Clinical Trials, Meta-Analyses and Practice Guidelines) in comparison with other Brics Countries in 2008-2015. / Lugacheva, L. I.; Musatov, M. I.

в: Medical Immunology (Russia), Том 20, № 1, 01.01.2018, стр. 7-18.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › обзорная статья › Рецензирование

BibTeX

@article{1a4b570b825449a0afceffe806d02a18,

title = "Structure of Russian publications in clinical immunology and allergology (Journal Articles, Clinical Trials, Meta-Analyses and Practice Guidelines) in comparison with other Brics Countries in 2008-2015",

abstract = "It is obvious that any evolving scientific medical field is a dynamic system that cannot stay at the stage of accumulation of primary information, and inevitably goes to the stages of clinical trials, generalization of information in meta-analyses and completes the study by creation of practical guidelines. The purpose of this study was a quantitative analysis of publicly available data in the field of clinical immunology in Russia during 2008-2015, identifying the ratios of clinical trials, meta-analyses, and practical guidelines, as well as evaluating the results by comparison with other BRICS countries. Study design was performed by retrospective bibliometric methods. It is revealed, that, in Russia, 16 clinical trials, 3 meta-analyses and 1 practice guideline were issued per 1000 original journal articles. Accordingly in the People{\textquoteright}s Republic of China this ratios have made 34/25/4; in Federal Republic of Brazil, 42/87/7; in Republic of India, 76/58/34, and in Republic of Southern Africa, 134/43/36. Moreover, we have obtained evidence which suggests optimistic prospectives for scientific clinical immunology in Russia.",

keywords = "Bibliometrics, Clinical trials, Meta-analyses, Practice guideline",

author = "Lugacheva, {L. I.} and Musatov, {M. I.}",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.15789/1563-0625-2018-1-7-18",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "7--18",

journal = "Medical Immunology (Russia)",

issn = "1563-0625",

publisher = "Russian Association of Allergologists and Clinical Immunologists, St. Petersburg Regional Branch (SPb RAACI)",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structure of Russian publications in clinical immunology and allergology (Journal Articles, Clinical Trials, Meta-Analyses and Practice Guidelines) in comparison with other Brics Countries in 2008-2015

AU - Lugacheva, L. I.

AU - Musatov, M. I.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - It is obvious that any evolving scientific medical field is a dynamic system that cannot stay at the stage of accumulation of primary information, and inevitably goes to the stages of clinical trials, generalization of information in meta-analyses and completes the study by creation of practical guidelines. The purpose of this study was a quantitative analysis of publicly available data in the field of clinical immunology in Russia during 2008-2015, identifying the ratios of clinical trials, meta-analyses, and practical guidelines, as well as evaluating the results by comparison with other BRICS countries. Study design was performed by retrospective bibliometric methods. It is revealed, that, in Russia, 16 clinical trials, 3 meta-analyses and 1 practice guideline were issued per 1000 original journal articles. Accordingly in the People’s Republic of China this ratios have made 34/25/4; in Federal Republic of Brazil, 42/87/7; in Republic of India, 76/58/34, and in Republic of Southern Africa, 134/43/36. Moreover, we have obtained evidence which suggests optimistic prospectives for scientific clinical immunology in Russia.

AB - It is obvious that any evolving scientific medical field is a dynamic system that cannot stay at the stage of accumulation of primary information, and inevitably goes to the stages of clinical trials, generalization of information in meta-analyses and completes the study by creation of practical guidelines. The purpose of this study was a quantitative analysis of publicly available data in the field of clinical immunology in Russia during 2008-2015, identifying the ratios of clinical trials, meta-analyses, and practical guidelines, as well as evaluating the results by comparison with other BRICS countries. Study design was performed by retrospective bibliometric methods. It is revealed, that, in Russia, 16 clinical trials, 3 meta-analyses and 1 practice guideline were issued per 1000 original journal articles. Accordingly in the People’s Republic of China this ratios have made 34/25/4; in Federal Republic of Brazil, 42/87/7; in Republic of India, 76/58/34, and in Republic of Southern Africa, 134/43/36. Moreover, we have obtained evidence which suggests optimistic prospectives for scientific clinical immunology in Russia.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Meta-analyses

KW - Practice guideline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041032271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15789/1563-0625-2018-1-7-18

DO - 10.15789/1563-0625-2018-1-7-18

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85041032271

VL - 20

SP - 7

EP - 18

JO - Medical Immunology (Russia)

JF - Medical Immunology (Russia)

SN - 1563-0625

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 12101012