Standard

Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages. / Kondratyev, M. V.; Fadeeva, O. P.

в: Regional Research of Russia, Том 11, № 4, 18, 10.2021, стр. 605-612.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kondratyev MV, Fadeeva OP. Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages. Regional Research of Russia. 2021 окт.;11(4):605-612. 18. doi: 10.1134/S2079970521040079

Author

Kondratyev, M. V. ; Fadeeva, O. P. / Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages. в: Regional Research of Russia. 2021 ; Том 11, № 4. стр. 605-612.

BibTeX

@article{a819ac64823e409599f26f227eabb8d0,
title = "Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages",
abstract = "Rural local self-governance as an independent political institution in Russia shows clear signs of degradation. Its effectiveness and efficiency have noticeably decreased over time. A reduction in the powers and financial resources of local authorities leads to destructive phenomena and processes: the condition of rural infrastructure is deteriorating, and negative demographic trends are developing. The aim of the study is to assess how the self-organization of rural residents can resist these trends, and to identify and classify the forms of proactive participation of the rural population in local self-governance. Generalization of the sociological research results using the case study method in rural settlements of Novosibirsk Oblast and Krasnoyarsk Krai has made it possible to identify the main types of formal and informal practices of participation of local residents in initiating projects for landscaping, social support, and other local issues. It is concluded that insufficient efficiency on the part of local authorities, their poor provision of resources, and unpreparedness for dialogue with the population entail the emergence of informal types of participation of residents in village life. Informal practices can foster community cohesion and contribute not only to the preservation but also to development of rural settlements. The active involvement of the rural population in various forms of participation makes it possible to partially compensate for the defects of local self-governance and counteract negative trends in the sustenance of rural settlements.",
keywords = "Krasnoyarsk Krai, local communities, local self-governance, Novosibirsk Oblast, practices of participation, rural settlements, self-organization, Siberia",
author = "Kondratyev, {M. V.} and Fadeeva, {O. P.}",
note = "Kondratyev, M. V. Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages / M. V. Kondratyev, O. P. Fadeeva // Regional Research of Russia. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – No 4. – P. 605-612. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.",
year = "2021",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1134/S2079970521040079",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "605--612",
journal = "Regional Research of Russia",
issn = "2079-9705",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages

AU - Kondratyev, M. V.

AU - Fadeeva, O. P.

N1 - Kondratyev, M. V. Practices of Public Participation in Local Self-Governance: Case Studies of Siberian Villages / M. V. Kondratyev, O. P. Fadeeva // Regional Research of Russia. – 2021. – Vol. 11. – No 4. – P. 605-612. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - Rural local self-governance as an independent political institution in Russia shows clear signs of degradation. Its effectiveness and efficiency have noticeably decreased over time. A reduction in the powers and financial resources of local authorities leads to destructive phenomena and processes: the condition of rural infrastructure is deteriorating, and negative demographic trends are developing. The aim of the study is to assess how the self-organization of rural residents can resist these trends, and to identify and classify the forms of proactive participation of the rural population in local self-governance. Generalization of the sociological research results using the case study method in rural settlements of Novosibirsk Oblast and Krasnoyarsk Krai has made it possible to identify the main types of formal and informal practices of participation of local residents in initiating projects for landscaping, social support, and other local issues. It is concluded that insufficient efficiency on the part of local authorities, their poor provision of resources, and unpreparedness for dialogue with the population entail the emergence of informal types of participation of residents in village life. Informal practices can foster community cohesion and contribute not only to the preservation but also to development of rural settlements. The active involvement of the rural population in various forms of participation makes it possible to partially compensate for the defects of local self-governance and counteract negative trends in the sustenance of rural settlements.

AB - Rural local self-governance as an independent political institution in Russia shows clear signs of degradation. Its effectiveness and efficiency have noticeably decreased over time. A reduction in the powers and financial resources of local authorities leads to destructive phenomena and processes: the condition of rural infrastructure is deteriorating, and negative demographic trends are developing. The aim of the study is to assess how the self-organization of rural residents can resist these trends, and to identify and classify the forms of proactive participation of the rural population in local self-governance. Generalization of the sociological research results using the case study method in rural settlements of Novosibirsk Oblast and Krasnoyarsk Krai has made it possible to identify the main types of formal and informal practices of participation of local residents in initiating projects for landscaping, social support, and other local issues. It is concluded that insufficient efficiency on the part of local authorities, their poor provision of resources, and unpreparedness for dialogue with the population entail the emergence of informal types of participation of residents in village life. Informal practices can foster community cohesion and contribute not only to the preservation but also to development of rural settlements. The active involvement of the rural population in various forms of participation makes it possible to partially compensate for the defects of local self-governance and counteract negative trends in the sustenance of rural settlements.

KW - Krasnoyarsk Krai

KW - local communities

KW - local self-governance

KW - Novosibirsk Oblast

KW - practices of participation

KW - rural settlements

KW - self-organization

KW - Siberia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121579502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47546031

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a7477c29-b358-3f55-b69b-df3e9946da24/

U2 - 10.1134/S2079970521040079

DO - 10.1134/S2079970521040079

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85121579502

VL - 11

SP - 605

EP - 612

JO - Regional Research of Russia

JF - Regional Research of Russia

SN - 2079-9705

IS - 4

M1 - 18

ER -

ID: 35241176