Standard

Man on Territory : Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School. / Goryachenko, E. E.; Cherkashina, T. Yu; Mosienko, N. L. и др.

в: Regional Research of Russia, Том 14, № Suppl 2, 04.03.2025, стр. S175-S186.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

BibTeX

@article{e1532163ec0c4821b62cc267a09304e0,
title = "Man on Territory: Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School",
abstract = "Abstract: This article examines the history of research by the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School (NESS) in the field of analysis of social problems of territories from the early 1960s to the present. The logic and main stages of the development of the NESS are shown in the works of its founders, successors, and modern researchers. The consistent transformation of both the complex of problems studied and the sociological tools used is considered. The analysis of the problems of migration between rural areas and cities and the development of a typology of rural settlements were subsequently supplemented by studies of the processes of urbanization and spatial mobility of the population and then by a systematic study of the socioterritorial structure of Soviet and Russian society. The stable features of the NESS are noted, traced in the works of authors of different generations, devoted to spatial mobility and the functioning of socioterritorial structures. These include the use of a systems approach to setting objectives and designing research projects; the use of complementary data sources; conceptual differences from the political mainstream, allowing researchers to draw conclusions that do not always coincide with government policy and the current conjuncture; a desire to use the latest tools for collecting and analyzing sociological data; and a desire to be included in the global context.",
keywords = "Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School, local territorial community, rural–urban migration, socioterritorial structure, spatial mobility",
author = "Goryachenko, {E. E.} and Cherkashina, {T. Yu} and Mosienko, {N. L.} and Malov, {K. V.} and Fadeeva, {O. P.}",
note = "This article was prepared according to the research plan of the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, project Actors, Drivers, and Consequences of Social Changes in Modern Society: Theory and Empirics, no. 121040100280-1. Man on Territory: Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School / E. E. Goryachenko, T. Yu. Cherkashina, N. L. Mosienko [et al.] // Regional Research of Russia. – 2024. – Vol. 14, No. S2. – P. S175-S186. – DOI 10.1134/S2079970524600823.",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1134/S2079970524600823",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "S175--S186",
journal = "Regional Research of Russia",
issn = "2079-9705",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "Suppl 2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Man on Territory

T2 - Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School

AU - Goryachenko, E. E.

AU - Cherkashina, T. Yu

AU - Mosienko, N. L.

AU - Malov, K. V.

AU - Fadeeva, O. P.

N1 - This article was prepared according to the research plan of the Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, project Actors, Drivers, and Consequences of Social Changes in Modern Society: Theory and Empirics, no. 121040100280-1. Man on Territory: Spatial Analysis in the Research of the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School / E. E. Goryachenko, T. Yu. Cherkashina, N. L. Mosienko [et al.] // Regional Research of Russia. – 2024. – Vol. 14, No. S2. – P. S175-S186. – DOI 10.1134/S2079970524600823.

PY - 2025/3/4

Y1 - 2025/3/4

N2 - Abstract: This article examines the history of research by the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School (NESS) in the field of analysis of social problems of territories from the early 1960s to the present. The logic and main stages of the development of the NESS are shown in the works of its founders, successors, and modern researchers. The consistent transformation of both the complex of problems studied and the sociological tools used is considered. The analysis of the problems of migration between rural areas and cities and the development of a typology of rural settlements were subsequently supplemented by studies of the processes of urbanization and spatial mobility of the population and then by a systematic study of the socioterritorial structure of Soviet and Russian society. The stable features of the NESS are noted, traced in the works of authors of different generations, devoted to spatial mobility and the functioning of socioterritorial structures. These include the use of a systems approach to setting objectives and designing research projects; the use of complementary data sources; conceptual differences from the political mainstream, allowing researchers to draw conclusions that do not always coincide with government policy and the current conjuncture; a desire to use the latest tools for collecting and analyzing sociological data; and a desire to be included in the global context.

AB - Abstract: This article examines the history of research by the Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School (NESS) in the field of analysis of social problems of territories from the early 1960s to the present. The logic and main stages of the development of the NESS are shown in the works of its founders, successors, and modern researchers. The consistent transformation of both the complex of problems studied and the sociological tools used is considered. The analysis of the problems of migration between rural areas and cities and the development of a typology of rural settlements were subsequently supplemented by studies of the processes of urbanization and spatial mobility of the population and then by a systematic study of the socioterritorial structure of Soviet and Russian society. The stable features of the NESS are noted, traced in the works of authors of different generations, devoted to spatial mobility and the functioning of socioterritorial structures. These include the use of a systems approach to setting objectives and designing research projects; the use of complementary data sources; conceptual differences from the political mainstream, allowing researchers to draw conclusions that do not always coincide with government policy and the current conjuncture; a desire to use the latest tools for collecting and analyzing sociological data; and a desire to be included in the global context.

KW - Novosibirsk Economic–Sociological School

KW - local territorial community

KW - rural–urban migration

KW - socioterritorial structure

KW - spatial mobility

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3b70a0a4-9b9e-399b-b37a-8080a7b3daa3/

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-86000078619&origin=inward&txGid=fb848024c4e6e9f2ff8b124370bee4d8

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=80408221

U2 - 10.1134/S2079970524600823

DO - 10.1134/S2079970524600823

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - S175-S186

JO - Regional Research of Russia

JF - Regional Research of Russia

SN - 2079-9705

IS - Suppl 2

ER -

ID: 65024618