Standard

ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2020. Examining causal effects of body mass index on back pain: a Mendelian randomization study. / Elgaeva, Elizaveta E.; Tsepilov, Yakov; Freidin, Maxim B. и др.

в: European Spine Journal, Том 29, № 4, 01.04.2020, стр. 686-691.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Elgaeva EE, Tsepilov Y, Freidin MB, Williams FMK, Aulchenko Y, Suri P. ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2020. Examining causal effects of body mass index on back pain: a Mendelian randomization study. European Spine Journal. 2020 апр. 1;29(4):686-691. Epub 2019 дек. 3. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06224-6

Author

BibTeX

@article{51bb35d31c874fd09b79b054aa5aa296,
title = "ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2020. Examining causal effects of body mass index on back pain: a Mendelian randomization study",
abstract = "Purpose: Measures of body fat accumulation are associated with back pain, but a causal association is unclear. We hypothesized that BMI would have causal effects on back pain. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of (1) back pain and (2) chronic back pain (duration > 3 months). Methods: We identified genetic instrumental variables for BMI (n = 60 variants) from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium in individuals of European ancestry (n = 322,154). We conducted GWAS of back pain and chronic back pain (n = 453,860) in a non-overlapping sample of individuals of European ancestry. We used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) meta-analysis as the primary method to estimate causal effects. Results: The IVW analysis showed evidence supporting a causal association of BMI on back pain, with a 1-standard deviation (4.65 kg/m2) increase in BMI conferring 1.15 times the odds of back pain (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.25, p = 0.001]; effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. The IVW analysis supported a causal association of BMI on chronic back pain (OR 1.20 per 1 SD deviation increase in BMI [95% CI 1.09–1.32; p = 0.0002]), and effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this first MR study of BMI and back pain, we found a significant causal effect of BMI on both back pain and chronic back pain.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Low back pain, Obesity, Prognosis, Risk factor, OBESITY, RISK, INSIGHTS",
author = "Elgaeva, {Elizaveta E.} and Yakov Tsepilov and Freidin, {Maxim B.} and Williams, {Frances M.K.} and Yurii Aulchenko and Pradeep Suri",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-019-06224-6",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "686--691",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag GmbH and Co. KG",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2020. Examining causal effects of body mass index on back pain: a Mendelian randomization study

AU - Elgaeva, Elizaveta E.

AU - Tsepilov, Yakov

AU - Freidin, Maxim B.

AU - Williams, Frances M.K.

AU - Aulchenko, Yurii

AU - Suri, Pradeep

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/4/1

Y1 - 2020/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Measures of body fat accumulation are associated with back pain, but a causal association is unclear. We hypothesized that BMI would have causal effects on back pain. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of (1) back pain and (2) chronic back pain (duration > 3 months). Methods: We identified genetic instrumental variables for BMI (n = 60 variants) from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium in individuals of European ancestry (n = 322,154). We conducted GWAS of back pain and chronic back pain (n = 453,860) in a non-overlapping sample of individuals of European ancestry. We used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) meta-analysis as the primary method to estimate causal effects. Results: The IVW analysis showed evidence supporting a causal association of BMI on back pain, with a 1-standard deviation (4.65 kg/m2) increase in BMI conferring 1.15 times the odds of back pain (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.25, p = 0.001]; effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. The IVW analysis supported a causal association of BMI on chronic back pain (OR 1.20 per 1 SD deviation increase in BMI [95% CI 1.09–1.32; p = 0.0002]), and effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this first MR study of BMI and back pain, we found a significant causal effect of BMI on both back pain and chronic back pain.

AB - Purpose: Measures of body fat accumulation are associated with back pain, but a causal association is unclear. We hypothesized that BMI would have causal effects on back pain. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of (1) back pain and (2) chronic back pain (duration > 3 months). Methods: We identified genetic instrumental variables for BMI (n = 60 variants) from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits consortium in individuals of European ancestry (n = 322,154). We conducted GWAS of back pain and chronic back pain (n = 453,860) in a non-overlapping sample of individuals of European ancestry. We used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) meta-analysis as the primary method to estimate causal effects. Results: The IVW analysis showed evidence supporting a causal association of BMI on back pain, with a 1-standard deviation (4.65 kg/m2) increase in BMI conferring 1.15 times the odds of back pain (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.25, p = 0.001]; effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. The IVW analysis supported a causal association of BMI on chronic back pain (OR 1.20 per 1 SD deviation increase in BMI [95% CI 1.09–1.32; p = 0.0002]), and effects were directionally consistent in secondary analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this first MR study of BMI and back pain, we found a significant causal effect of BMI on both back pain and chronic back pain.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Low back pain

KW - Obesity

KW - Prognosis

KW - Risk factor

KW - OBESITY

KW - RISK

KW - INSIGHTS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075880314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-019-06224-6

DO - 10.1007/s00586-019-06224-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 31797139

AN - SCOPUS:85075880314

VL - 29

SP - 686

EP - 691

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 22578824