Standard

Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome. / Ponomarenko, Mikhail; Kleshchev, Maxim; Ponomarenko, Petr и др.

в: BMC Genetics, Том 21, № Suppl 1, 89, 01.10.2020.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Ponomarenko, M, Kleshchev, M, Ponomarenko, P, Chadaeva, I, Sharypova, E, Rasskazov, D, Kolmykov, S, Drachkova, I, Vasiliev, G, Gutorova, N, Ignatieva, E, Savinkova, L, Bogomolov, A, Osadchuk, L, Osadchuk, A & Oshchepkov, D 2020, 'Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome', BMC Genetics, Том. 21, № Suppl 1, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6

APA

Ponomarenko, M., Kleshchev, M., Ponomarenko, P., Chadaeva, I., Sharypova, E., Rasskazov, D., Kolmykov, S., Drachkova, I., Vasiliev, G., Gutorova, N., Ignatieva, E., Savinkova, L., Bogomolov, A., Osadchuk, L., Osadchuk, A., & Oshchepkov, D. (2020). Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome. BMC Genetics, 21(Suppl 1), [89]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6

Vancouver

Ponomarenko M, Kleshchev M, Ponomarenko P, Chadaeva I, Sharypova E, Rasskazov D и др. Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome. BMC Genetics. 2020 окт. 1;21(Suppl 1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6

Author

Ponomarenko, Mikhail ; Kleshchev, Maxim ; Ponomarenko, Petr и др. / Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome. в: BMC Genetics. 2020 ; Том 21, № Suppl 1.

BibTeX

@article{fa589b0e0ca444cd8c42831e421bf64d,
title = "Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome",
abstract = "Background: In population ecology, the concept of reproductive potential denotes the most vital indicator of chances to produce and sustain a healthy descendant until his/her reproductive maturity under the best conditions. This concept links quality of life and longevity of an individual with disease susceptibilities encoded by his/her genome. Female reproductive potential has been investigated deeply, widely, and comprehensively in the past, but the male one has not received an equal amount of attention. Therefore, here we focused on the human Y chromosome and found candidate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers of male reproductive potential. Results: Examining in silico (i.e., using our earlier created Web-service SNP_TATA_Z-tester) all 1206 unannotated SNPs within 70 bp proximal promoters of all 63 Y-linked genes, we found 261 possible male-reproductive-potential SNP markers that can significantly alter the binding affinity of TATA-binding protein (TBP) for these promoters. Among them, there are candidate SNP markers of spermatogenesis disorders (e.g., rs1402972626), pediatric cancer (e.g., rs1483581212) as well as male anxiety damaging family relationships and mother{\textquoteright}s and children{\textquoteright}s health (e.g., rs187456378). First of all, we selectively verified in vitro both absolute and relative values of the analyzed TBP–promoter affinity, whose Pearson{\textquoteright}s coefficients of correlation between predicted and measured values were r = 0.84 (significance p < 0.025) and r = 0.98 (p < 0.025), respectively. Next, we found that there are twofold fewer candidate SNP markers decreasing TBP–promoter affinity relative to those increasing it, whereas in the genome-wide norm, SNP-induced damage to TBP–promoter complexes is fourfold more frequent than SNP-induced improvement (p < 0.05, binomial distribution). This means natural selection against underexpression of these genes. Meanwhile, the numbers of candidate SNP markers of an increase and decrease in male reproductive potential were indistinguishably equal to each other (p < 0.05) as if male self-domestication could have happened, with its experimentally known disruptive natural selection. Because there is still not enough scientific evidence that this could have happened, we discuss the human diseases associated with candidate SNP markers of male reproductive potential that may correspond to domestication-related disorders in pets. Conclusions: Overall, our findings seem to support a self-domestication syndrome with disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential preventing Y-linked underexpression of a protein.",
keywords = "Candidate SNP marker, Gene, Human, Promoter, Reproductive potential, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, TATA box, TATA-binding protein, Verification, Y chromosome, TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-BINDING, SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE, CANDIDATE SNP MARKERS, IDENTIFICATION, TATA-BINDING PROTEIN, HUMAN HEREDITARY-DISEASES, DATABASE, AFFINITY, DNA, EXPRESSION",
author = "Mikhail Ponomarenko and Maxim Kleshchev and Petr Ponomarenko and Irina Chadaeva and Ekaterina Sharypova and Dmitry Rasskazov and Semyon Kolmykov and Irina Drachkova and Gennady Vasiliev and Natalia Gutorova and Elena Ignatieva and Ludmila Savinkova and Anton Bogomolov and Ludmila Osadchuk and Alexandr Osadchuk and Dmitry Oshchepkov",
year = "2020",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
journal = "BMC Genetics",
issn = "1471-2156",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
number = "Suppl 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential prevents underexpression of protein-coding genes on the human Y chromosome as a self-domestication syndrome

AU - Ponomarenko, Mikhail

AU - Kleshchev, Maxim

AU - Ponomarenko, Petr

AU - Chadaeva, Irina

AU - Sharypova, Ekaterina

AU - Rasskazov, Dmitry

AU - Kolmykov, Semyon

AU - Drachkova, Irina

AU - Vasiliev, Gennady

AU - Gutorova, Natalia

AU - Ignatieva, Elena

AU - Savinkova, Ludmila

AU - Bogomolov, Anton

AU - Osadchuk, Ludmila

AU - Osadchuk, Alexandr

AU - Oshchepkov, Dmitry

PY - 2020/10/1

Y1 - 2020/10/1

N2 - Background: In population ecology, the concept of reproductive potential denotes the most vital indicator of chances to produce and sustain a healthy descendant until his/her reproductive maturity under the best conditions. This concept links quality of life and longevity of an individual with disease susceptibilities encoded by his/her genome. Female reproductive potential has been investigated deeply, widely, and comprehensively in the past, but the male one has not received an equal amount of attention. Therefore, here we focused on the human Y chromosome and found candidate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers of male reproductive potential. Results: Examining in silico (i.e., using our earlier created Web-service SNP_TATA_Z-tester) all 1206 unannotated SNPs within 70 bp proximal promoters of all 63 Y-linked genes, we found 261 possible male-reproductive-potential SNP markers that can significantly alter the binding affinity of TATA-binding protein (TBP) for these promoters. Among them, there are candidate SNP markers of spermatogenesis disorders (e.g., rs1402972626), pediatric cancer (e.g., rs1483581212) as well as male anxiety damaging family relationships and mother’s and children’s health (e.g., rs187456378). First of all, we selectively verified in vitro both absolute and relative values of the analyzed TBP–promoter affinity, whose Pearson’s coefficients of correlation between predicted and measured values were r = 0.84 (significance p < 0.025) and r = 0.98 (p < 0.025), respectively. Next, we found that there are twofold fewer candidate SNP markers decreasing TBP–promoter affinity relative to those increasing it, whereas in the genome-wide norm, SNP-induced damage to TBP–promoter complexes is fourfold more frequent than SNP-induced improvement (p < 0.05, binomial distribution). This means natural selection against underexpression of these genes. Meanwhile, the numbers of candidate SNP markers of an increase and decrease in male reproductive potential were indistinguishably equal to each other (p < 0.05) as if male self-domestication could have happened, with its experimentally known disruptive natural selection. Because there is still not enough scientific evidence that this could have happened, we discuss the human diseases associated with candidate SNP markers of male reproductive potential that may correspond to domestication-related disorders in pets. Conclusions: Overall, our findings seem to support a self-domestication syndrome with disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential preventing Y-linked underexpression of a protein.

AB - Background: In population ecology, the concept of reproductive potential denotes the most vital indicator of chances to produce and sustain a healthy descendant until his/her reproductive maturity under the best conditions. This concept links quality of life and longevity of an individual with disease susceptibilities encoded by his/her genome. Female reproductive potential has been investigated deeply, widely, and comprehensively in the past, but the male one has not received an equal amount of attention. Therefore, here we focused on the human Y chromosome and found candidate single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers of male reproductive potential. Results: Examining in silico (i.e., using our earlier created Web-service SNP_TATA_Z-tester) all 1206 unannotated SNPs within 70 bp proximal promoters of all 63 Y-linked genes, we found 261 possible male-reproductive-potential SNP markers that can significantly alter the binding affinity of TATA-binding protein (TBP) for these promoters. Among them, there are candidate SNP markers of spermatogenesis disorders (e.g., rs1402972626), pediatric cancer (e.g., rs1483581212) as well as male anxiety damaging family relationships and mother’s and children’s health (e.g., rs187456378). First of all, we selectively verified in vitro both absolute and relative values of the analyzed TBP–promoter affinity, whose Pearson’s coefficients of correlation between predicted and measured values were r = 0.84 (significance p < 0.025) and r = 0.98 (p < 0.025), respectively. Next, we found that there are twofold fewer candidate SNP markers decreasing TBP–promoter affinity relative to those increasing it, whereas in the genome-wide norm, SNP-induced damage to TBP–promoter complexes is fourfold more frequent than SNP-induced improvement (p < 0.05, binomial distribution). This means natural selection against underexpression of these genes. Meanwhile, the numbers of candidate SNP markers of an increase and decrease in male reproductive potential were indistinguishably equal to each other (p < 0.05) as if male self-domestication could have happened, with its experimentally known disruptive natural selection. Because there is still not enough scientific evidence that this could have happened, we discuss the human diseases associated with candidate SNP markers of male reproductive potential that may correspond to domestication-related disorders in pets. Conclusions: Overall, our findings seem to support a self-domestication syndrome with disruptive natural selection by male reproductive potential preventing Y-linked underexpression of a protein.

KW - Candidate SNP marker

KW - Gene

KW - Human

KW - Promoter

KW - Reproductive potential

KW - Single-nucleotide polymorphism

KW - TATA box

KW - TATA-binding protein

KW - Verification

KW - Y chromosome

KW - TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-BINDING

KW - SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE

KW - CANDIDATE SNP MARKERS

KW - IDENTIFICATION

KW - TATA-BINDING PROTEIN

KW - HUMAN HEREDITARY-DISEASES

KW - DATABASE

KW - AFFINITY

KW - DNA

KW - EXPRESSION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093532649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6

DO - 10.1186/s12863-020-00896-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 33092533

AN - SCOPUS:85093532649

VL - 21

JO - BMC Genetics

JF - BMC Genetics

SN - 1471-2156

IS - Suppl 1

M1 - 89

ER -

ID: 25650989