Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
Cultural heterogeneity and economic development in Russia. / Bufetova, Anna N.; Khrzhanovskaya, Alina A.; Kolomak, Evgeniya A.
в: Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences, Том 13, № 4, 01.01.2020, стр. 453-463.Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › Рецензирование
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultural heterogeneity and economic development in Russia
AU - Bufetova, Anna N.
AU - Khrzhanovskaya, Alina A.
AU - Kolomak, Evgeniya A.
N1 - Буфетова А.Н., Хржановская А.А., Коломак Е.А. Культурная неоднородность и экономическое развитие в России // Журнал СФУ. Гуманитарные науки. - 2020. - Т. 13. - № 4. - С. 453–463
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - The paper studies change in the national and religious structure of the population and assesses the impact of cultural heterogeneity on the economic development of Russian regions. Sources of information on the national structure of the population are 2002 and 2010 censuses. The analysis of heterogeneity in the religious structure is carried out for 2012 and 2015 and sources of the data are Atlas of Religions and Nationalities of Russia and the Federal Agency for Nationality Affairs. Fractionalisation and polarisation indices are used to assess the level of cultural heterogeneity. The study of these characteristics showed that despite the intensification of migration processes in contemporary Russia, there were no major changes in the cultural structure of the population of the regions. At the same time, there is a wide variety of national and religious structures in the regions. The impact of cultural heterogeneity on economic development is estimated using regression analysis. The panel regression of gross regional product on labor, capital, controlling variables and indices of cultural heterogeneity is estimated. The results have shown: 1) the positive impact of ethnic and cultural fractionalisation on economic development; 2) the absence of a statistically significant relationship between the level of national polarisation and development; 3) the negative impact of religious polarisation on regional productivity. The results suggest that it is necessary to consider cultural heterogeneity of the society and the possibility of contradictions due to the cultural differences in the regional policy and in the decisions on the public finance.
AB - The paper studies change in the national and religious structure of the population and assesses the impact of cultural heterogeneity on the economic development of Russian regions. Sources of information on the national structure of the population are 2002 and 2010 censuses. The analysis of heterogeneity in the religious structure is carried out for 2012 and 2015 and sources of the data are Atlas of Religions and Nationalities of Russia and the Federal Agency for Nationality Affairs. Fractionalisation and polarisation indices are used to assess the level of cultural heterogeneity. The study of these characteristics showed that despite the intensification of migration processes in contemporary Russia, there were no major changes in the cultural structure of the population of the regions. At the same time, there is a wide variety of national and religious structures in the regions. The impact of cultural heterogeneity on economic development is estimated using regression analysis. The panel regression of gross regional product on labor, capital, controlling variables and indices of cultural heterogeneity is estimated. The results have shown: 1) the positive impact of ethnic and cultural fractionalisation on economic development; 2) the absence of a statistically significant relationship between the level of national polarisation and development; 3) the negative impact of religious polarisation on regional productivity. The results suggest that it is necessary to consider cultural heterogeneity of the society and the possibility of contradictions due to the cultural differences in the regional policy and in the decisions on the public finance.
KW - Cultural heterogeneity
KW - Empirical analysis
KW - Fractionalisation
KW - Nationality
KW - Polarisation
KW - Regression
KW - Religion
KW - Russian regions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085122239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42768230
U2 - 10.17516/1997-1370-0582
DO - 10.17516/1997-1370-0582
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85085122239
VL - 13
SP - 453
EP - 463
JO - Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences
JF - Journal of Siberian Federal University - Humanities and Social Sciences
SN - 1997-1370
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 24390839