Standard

Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. / Rudyak, Valery Ya; Pryazhnikov, Maxim I.; Minakov, Andrey V. и др.

в: Diamond and Related Materials, Том 139, 110376, 11.2023.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатьяРецензирование

Harvard

Rudyak, VY, Pryazhnikov, MI, Minakov, AV & Shupik, AA 2023, 'Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes', Diamond and Related Materials, Том. 139, 110376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376

APA

Rudyak, V. Y., Pryazhnikov, M. I., Minakov, A. V., & Shupik, A. A. (2023). Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Diamond and Related Materials, 139, [110376]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376

Vancouver

Rudyak VY, Pryazhnikov MI, Minakov AV, Shupik AA. Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Diamond and Related Materials. 2023 нояб.;139:110376. doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376

Author

Rudyak, Valery Ya ; Pryazhnikov, Maxim I. ; Minakov, Andrey V. и др. / Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. в: Diamond and Related Materials. 2023 ; Том 139.

BibTeX

@article{06849b9e3a494fb999fca7b03497948e,
title = "Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes",
abstract = "The purpose of the present paper is to systematically study and compare the thermal conductivity of nanofluids based on water+surfactants, ethylene glycol, ethylene glycol+surfactants, and isopropyl alcohol with single-walled (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). The weight concentration of carbon nanotubes varied from 0.01 to 1 %. In all cases, the excess of the thermal conductivity coefficient in the nanofluid with SWCNTs is significantly higher than with MWCNTs. However, it should be borne in mind that the volume concentrations of MWCNTs in this case are several times lower than those of SWCNTs. The maximum excess of thermal conductivity coefficient was registered in the nanofluids based on isopropyl alcohol and is over 50 % at a SWCNT weight concentration of only 0.2 %. The enhancement of the thermal conductivity coefficient is greater, the lower the thermal conductivity coefficient of based fluid. The effect of the surfactants on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids is discussed. The thermal conductivity coefficients of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol+surfactants are almost twice as high as those of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol. It is shown that at a fixed weight concentration, the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with a decrease in the nanotube length, but their volume concentration also increases in almost proportion to the length decreasing. Finally, the nanofluids with SWCNTs provide an excess of the thermal conductivity unattainable with the use of conventional spherical nanoparticles.",
keywords = "Carbon nanotubes, Nanofluid, Non-Newtonian fluid, Surfactant, Thermal conductivity",
author = "Rudyak, {Valery Ya} and Pryazhnikov, {Maxim I.} and Minakov, {Andrey V.} and Shupik, {Andrey A.}",
note = "The paper was supported of the Russian Science Foundation (Agreement No. 20-19-00043).",
year = "2023",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
journal = "Diamond and Related Materials",
issn = "0925-9635",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of thermal conductivity of nanofluids with single-walled and multi-walled carbon nanotubes

AU - Rudyak, Valery Ya

AU - Pryazhnikov, Maxim I.

AU - Minakov, Andrey V.

AU - Shupik, Andrey A.

N1 - The paper was supported of the Russian Science Foundation (Agreement No. 20-19-00043).

PY - 2023/11

Y1 - 2023/11

N2 - The purpose of the present paper is to systematically study and compare the thermal conductivity of nanofluids based on water+surfactants, ethylene glycol, ethylene glycol+surfactants, and isopropyl alcohol with single-walled (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). The weight concentration of carbon nanotubes varied from 0.01 to 1 %. In all cases, the excess of the thermal conductivity coefficient in the nanofluid with SWCNTs is significantly higher than with MWCNTs. However, it should be borne in mind that the volume concentrations of MWCNTs in this case are several times lower than those of SWCNTs. The maximum excess of thermal conductivity coefficient was registered in the nanofluids based on isopropyl alcohol and is over 50 % at a SWCNT weight concentration of only 0.2 %. The enhancement of the thermal conductivity coefficient is greater, the lower the thermal conductivity coefficient of based fluid. The effect of the surfactants on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids is discussed. The thermal conductivity coefficients of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol+surfactants are almost twice as high as those of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol. It is shown that at a fixed weight concentration, the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with a decrease in the nanotube length, but their volume concentration also increases in almost proportion to the length decreasing. Finally, the nanofluids with SWCNTs provide an excess of the thermal conductivity unattainable with the use of conventional spherical nanoparticles.

AB - The purpose of the present paper is to systematically study and compare the thermal conductivity of nanofluids based on water+surfactants, ethylene glycol, ethylene glycol+surfactants, and isopropyl alcohol with single-walled (SWCNT) and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). The weight concentration of carbon nanotubes varied from 0.01 to 1 %. In all cases, the excess of the thermal conductivity coefficient in the nanofluid with SWCNTs is significantly higher than with MWCNTs. However, it should be borne in mind that the volume concentrations of MWCNTs in this case are several times lower than those of SWCNTs. The maximum excess of thermal conductivity coefficient was registered in the nanofluids based on isopropyl alcohol and is over 50 % at a SWCNT weight concentration of only 0.2 %. The enhancement of the thermal conductivity coefficient is greater, the lower the thermal conductivity coefficient of based fluid. The effect of the surfactants on the thermal conductivity of nanofluids is discussed. The thermal conductivity coefficients of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol+surfactants are almost twice as high as those of nanofluids based on ethylene glycol. It is shown that at a fixed weight concentration, the thermal conductivity of nanofluids increases with a decrease in the nanotube length, but their volume concentration also increases in almost proportion to the length decreasing. Finally, the nanofluids with SWCNTs provide an excess of the thermal conductivity unattainable with the use of conventional spherical nanoparticles.

KW - Carbon nanotubes

KW - Nanofluid

KW - Non-Newtonian fluid

KW - Surfactant

KW - Thermal conductivity

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85171628398&origin=inward&txGid=8dfed158cd39865d25e36c1608d22baf

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4b67a875-4261-3ad1-89d4-a09c8d900456/

U2 - 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376

DO - 10.1016/j.diamond.2023.110376

M3 - Article

VL - 139

JO - Diamond and Related Materials

JF - Diamond and Related Materials

SN - 0925-9635

M1 - 110376

ER -

ID: 55508075