Standard

Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers. / Radnatarov, Daba; Andryushkov, Valerii; Kobtsev, Sergey.

Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII. ред. / Cornelius F. Hahlweg; Joseph R. Mulley. SPIE, 2020. 114830S (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; Том 11483).

Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › статья в сборнике материалов конференции › научная › Рецензирование

Harvard

Radnatarov, D, Andryushkov, V & Kobtsev, S 2020, Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers. в CF Hahlweg & JR Mulley (ред.), Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII., 114830S, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, Том. 11483, SPIE, Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII 2020, Virtual, Online, Соединенные Штаты Америки, 24.08.2020. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2568335

APA

Radnatarov, D., Andryushkov, V., & Kobtsev, S. (2020). Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers. в C. F. Hahlweg, & J. R. Mulley (Ред.), Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII [114830S] (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; Том 11483). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2568335

Vancouver

Radnatarov D, Andryushkov V, Kobtsev S. Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers. в Hahlweg CF, Mulley JR, Редакторы, Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII. SPIE. 2020. 114830S. (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering). doi: 10.1117/12.2568335

Author

Radnatarov, Daba ; Andryushkov, Valerii ; Kobtsev, Sergey. / Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers. Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII. Редактор / Cornelius F. Hahlweg ; Joseph R. Mulley. SPIE, 2020. (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering).

BibTeX

@inproceedings{b4f57c2deddd459599ca71673173923c,
title = "Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers",
abstract = "Experimentally compared for the first time is the sensitivity of two magnetometer types implemented on a common base of rubidium atomic clock with coherent population trapping (CPT). The first magnetometer used a magneto-sensitive optically excited CPT resonance, the other measured field strength through the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) excited with alternating magnetic field. We show advantages and limitations of these promising quantum sensing technologies. Sensitivity of both types was measured under resonance excitation on the D1 line of 87Rb. We demonstrate that the Crossed D sign¡Crossed D sign Crossed D sign¢ magnetometer sensitivity may exceed that of the EPR device by two orders of magnitude. ",
keywords = "Atomic clock, CPT resonance, Optic cell, Quadrature signal, Rubidium, ATOMIC CLOCK, optic cell, rubidium, quadrature signal",
author = "Daba Radnatarov and Valerii Andryushkov and Sergey Kobtsev",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "21",
doi = "10.1117/12.2568335",
language = "English",
series = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",
publisher = "SPIE",
editor = "Hahlweg, {Cornelius F.} and Mulley, {Joseph R.}",
booktitle = "Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII",
address = "United States",
note = "Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII 2020 ; Conference date: 24-08-2020 Through 04-09-2020",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers

AU - Radnatarov, Daba

AU - Andryushkov, Valerii

AU - Kobtsev, Sergey

PY - 2020/8/21

Y1 - 2020/8/21

N2 - Experimentally compared for the first time is the sensitivity of two magnetometer types implemented on a common base of rubidium atomic clock with coherent population trapping (CPT). The first magnetometer used a magneto-sensitive optically excited CPT resonance, the other measured field strength through the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) excited with alternating magnetic field. We show advantages and limitations of these promising quantum sensing technologies. Sensitivity of both types was measured under resonance excitation on the D1 line of 87Rb. We demonstrate that the Crossed D sign¡Crossed D sign Crossed D sign¢ magnetometer sensitivity may exceed that of the EPR device by two orders of magnitude.

AB - Experimentally compared for the first time is the sensitivity of two magnetometer types implemented on a common base of rubidium atomic clock with coherent population trapping (CPT). The first magnetometer used a magneto-sensitive optically excited CPT resonance, the other measured field strength through the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) excited with alternating magnetic field. We show advantages and limitations of these promising quantum sensing technologies. Sensitivity of both types was measured under resonance excitation on the D1 line of 87Rb. We demonstrate that the Crossed D sign¡Crossed D sign Crossed D sign¢ magnetometer sensitivity may exceed that of the EPR device by two orders of magnitude.

KW - Atomic clock

KW - CPT resonance

KW - Optic cell

KW - Quadrature signal

KW - Rubidium

KW - ATOMIC CLOCK

KW - optic cell

KW - rubidium

KW - quadrature signal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092448817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.2568335

DO - 10.1117/12.2568335

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85092448817

T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

BT - Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII

A2 - Hahlweg, Cornelius F.

A2 - Mulley, Joseph R.

PB - SPIE

T2 - Novel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII 2020

Y2 - 24 August 2020 through 4 September 2020

ER -

ID: 25611844