Comparison of open boundary conditions realizations for continuous injection of an electron beam into a plasma in the case of the pic and parabolic form-factors

Standard

Comparison of open boundary conditions realizations for continuous injection of an electron beam into a plasma in the case of the pic and parabolic form-factors. / Berendeev, E. A.; Annenkov, V. V.; Timofeev, I. V. и др.

в: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Том 1103, № 1, 012022, 15.10.2018.

Результаты исследований: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья по материалам конференции › Рецензирование

BibTeX

@article{1ab2c96c00944d2d88298c9da12361dc,

title = "Comparison of open boundary conditions realizations for continuous injection of an electron beam into a plasma in the case of the pic and parabolic form-factors",

abstract = "The paper is devoted to a comparison of methods for realizing open boundary conditions that allow continuous injection of a beam of charged particles into a plasma in the PIC model in the case of different particle form-factors, as well as with two variants of boundary conditions at plasma ends. It is shown that simulation results coincide for the PIC and parabolic form-factors for the problem of injecting an electron beam into a plasma in 1D geometry for all the boundary conditions under consideration. In 2D geometry, we find the discrepancy between these models, as well as the inapplicability of the Mur's boundary conditions for electromagnetic fields simultaneously with the condition of equality of currents in boundary cells. The number of particles in a cell, which is necessary for convergence of calculations, for each method is determined.",

author = "Berendeev, {E. A.} and Annenkov, {V. V.} and Timofeev, {I. V.} and Dudnikova, {G. I.} and Efimova, {A. A.}",

note = "Funding Information: The development of boundary conditions for PIC code was conducted within the framework of the budget project 0315-2016-0009 for ICMMG SB RAS. The code with a parabolic shape-factor and 2D3V the calculations are performed with the support of the grant RFBR 18-32-00107. Computational experiments on beam injection in the 1D3V case were obtained with the support Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; Workshop on Numerical Modeling in MHD and Plasma Physics: Methods, Tools, and Outcomes. Honor of academician Anatoly Alekseev's 90th Birthday ; Conference date: 11-10-2018 Through 12-10-2018",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/1103/1/012022",

language = "English",

volume = "1103",

journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",

issn = "1742-6588",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of open boundary conditions realizations for continuous injection of an electron beam into a plasma in the case of the pic and parabolic form-factors

AU - Berendeev, E. A.

AU - Annenkov, V. V.

AU - Timofeev, I. V.

AU - Dudnikova, G. I.

AU - Efimova, A. A.

N1 - Funding Information: The development of boundary conditions for PIC code was conducted within the framework of the budget project 0315-2016-0009 for ICMMG SB RAS. The code with a parabolic shape-factor and 2D3V the calculations are performed with the support of the grant RFBR 18-32-00107. Computational experiments on beam injection in the 1D3V case were obtained with the support Publisher Copyright: © 2018 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/10/15

Y1 - 2018/10/15

N2 - The paper is devoted to a comparison of methods for realizing open boundary conditions that allow continuous injection of a beam of charged particles into a plasma in the PIC model in the case of different particle form-factors, as well as with two variants of boundary conditions at plasma ends. It is shown that simulation results coincide for the PIC and parabolic form-factors for the problem of injecting an electron beam into a plasma in 1D geometry for all the boundary conditions under consideration. In 2D geometry, we find the discrepancy between these models, as well as the inapplicability of the Mur's boundary conditions for electromagnetic fields simultaneously with the condition of equality of currents in boundary cells. The number of particles in a cell, which is necessary for convergence of calculations, for each method is determined.

AB - The paper is devoted to a comparison of methods for realizing open boundary conditions that allow continuous injection of a beam of charged particles into a plasma in the PIC model in the case of different particle form-factors, as well as with two variants of boundary conditions at plasma ends. It is shown that simulation results coincide for the PIC and parabolic form-factors for the problem of injecting an electron beam into a plasma in 1D geometry for all the boundary conditions under consideration. In 2D geometry, we find the discrepancy between these models, as well as the inapplicability of the Mur's boundary conditions for electromagnetic fields simultaneously with the condition of equality of currents in boundary cells. The number of particles in a cell, which is necessary for convergence of calculations, for each method is determined.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056402973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/1103/1/012022

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/1103/1/012022

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85056402973

VL - 1103

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

SN - 1742-6588

IS - 1

M1 - 012022

T2 - Workshop on Numerical Modeling in MHD and Plasma Physics: Methods, Tools, and Outcomes. Honor of academician Anatoly Alekseev's 90th Birthday

Y2 - 11 October 2018 through 12 October 2018

ER -

ID: 27344920