Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › глава/раздел › научная › Рецензирование
Bertrand meets ford : Benefits and losses. / Sidorov, Alexander; Parenti, Mathieu; Thisse, Jacques Francois.
Static and Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations and Applications. Birkhauser Verlag Basel, 2018. стр. 251-268 (Static and Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations and Applications).Результаты исследований: Публикации в книгах, отчётах, сборниках, трудах конференций › глава/раздел › научная › Рецензирование
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Bertrand meets ford
T2 - Benefits and losses
AU - Sidorov, Alexander
AU - Parenti, Mathieu
AU - Thisse, Jacques Francois
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - The paper carries out the detailed comparison of two types of imperfect competition in a general equilibrium model. The price-taking Bertrand competition assumes the myopic income-taking behavior of firms, another type of behavior, price competition under a Ford effect, implies that the firms’ strategic choice takes into account their impact to consumers’ income. Our findings suggest that firms under the Ford effect gather more market power (measured by Lerner index), than “myopic” firms, which is agreed with the folk wisdom “Knowledge is power.” Another folk wisdom implies that increasing of the firms’ market power leads to diminishing in consumers’ well-being (measured by indirect utility.) We show that in general this is not true. We also obtain the sufficient conditions on the representative consumer preference providing the “intuitive” behavior of the indirect utility and show that this condition satisfy the classes of utility functions, which are commonly used as examples (e.g., CES, CARA and HARA).
AB - The paper carries out the detailed comparison of two types of imperfect competition in a general equilibrium model. The price-taking Bertrand competition assumes the myopic income-taking behavior of firms, another type of behavior, price competition under a Ford effect, implies that the firms’ strategic choice takes into account their impact to consumers’ income. Our findings suggest that firms under the Ford effect gather more market power (measured by Lerner index), than “myopic” firms, which is agreed with the folk wisdom “Knowledge is power.” Another folk wisdom implies that increasing of the firms’ market power leads to diminishing in consumers’ well-being (measured by indirect utility.) We show that in general this is not true. We also obtain the sufficient conditions on the representative consumer preference providing the “intuitive” behavior of the indirect utility and show that this condition satisfy the classes of utility functions, which are commonly used as examples (e.g., CES, CARA and HARA).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052397093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-92988-0_15
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-92988-0_15
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85052397093
T3 - Static and Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations and Applications
SP - 251
EP - 268
BT - Static and Dynamic Game Theory
PB - Birkhauser Verlag Basel
ER -
ID: 16312864