Standard

Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch. / Sidorov, A. V.

In: Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 12-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Sidorov, AV 2018, 'Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch', Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 12-31. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1

APA

Sidorov, A. V. (2018). Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации, 40(4), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1

Vancouver

Sidorov AV. Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2018 Jan 1;40(4):12-31. doi: 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1

Author

Sidorov, A. V. / Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch. In: Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 12-31.

BibTeX

@article{76e27e447ec4421cb4d3800f183a7f50,
title = "Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a l{\'a} christaller–L{\"o}sch",
abstract = "One of the most striking feature of the spatial economy is that cities form a hierarchical system exhibiting some regularity in terms of their size and the Public goods they supply. In order to show how such a hierarchical system may emerge, we consider a spatial economy model with monopolistic competitive markets for the multiple industrial sectors. As transport costs of trade assumed to be negligible, the key role in the urban system formation plays urban costs, which are the sum of a housing expenditures (e.g., rent) and commuting costs of worker{\textquoteright}s transporting from home to the job place. Unlike the product transport costs, these ones are significant for the large cities, impeding to their unbounded growth and playing the role of dispersion forces. Agglomeration effect, in turn, is based on the local non-tradable public goods, which attract the people from settlemens of the lower rank. It is shown that this model generates the unique equilibrium outcome, which demonstrate the real urban hierarchic structures{\textquoteright} features.",
keywords = "Central places, Monopolistic competition, Public goods, Urban cost, Urban hierarchy, public goods, central places, urban cost, urban hierarchy, monopolistic competition, CITIES, GOODS, TRADE",
author = "Sidorov, {A. V.}",
year = "2018",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "12--31",
journal = "Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации",
issn = "2221-2264",
publisher = "New Economic Association",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban costs and their role in a central places theory a lá christaller–Lösch

AU - Sidorov, A. V.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - One of the most striking feature of the spatial economy is that cities form a hierarchical system exhibiting some regularity in terms of their size and the Public goods they supply. In order to show how such a hierarchical system may emerge, we consider a spatial economy model with monopolistic competitive markets for the multiple industrial sectors. As transport costs of trade assumed to be negligible, the key role in the urban system formation plays urban costs, which are the sum of a housing expenditures (e.g., rent) and commuting costs of worker’s transporting from home to the job place. Unlike the product transport costs, these ones are significant for the large cities, impeding to their unbounded growth and playing the role of dispersion forces. Agglomeration effect, in turn, is based on the local non-tradable public goods, which attract the people from settlemens of the lower rank. It is shown that this model generates the unique equilibrium outcome, which demonstrate the real urban hierarchic structures’ features.

AB - One of the most striking feature of the spatial economy is that cities form a hierarchical system exhibiting some regularity in terms of their size and the Public goods they supply. In order to show how such a hierarchical system may emerge, we consider a spatial economy model with monopolistic competitive markets for the multiple industrial sectors. As transport costs of trade assumed to be negligible, the key role in the urban system formation plays urban costs, which are the sum of a housing expenditures (e.g., rent) and commuting costs of worker’s transporting from home to the job place. Unlike the product transport costs, these ones are significant for the large cities, impeding to their unbounded growth and playing the role of dispersion forces. Agglomeration effect, in turn, is based on the local non-tradable public goods, which attract the people from settlemens of the lower rank. It is shown that this model generates the unique equilibrium outcome, which demonstrate the real urban hierarchic structures’ features.

KW - Central places

KW - Monopolistic competition

KW - Public goods

KW - Urban cost

KW - Urban hierarchy

KW - public goods

KW - central places

KW - urban cost

KW - urban hierarchy

KW - monopolistic competition

KW - CITIES

KW - GOODS

KW - TRADE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061911282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36684930

U2 - 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1

DO - 10.31737/2221-2264-2018-40-4-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061911282

VL - 40

SP - 12

EP - 31

JO - Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации

JF - Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации

SN - 2221-2264

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 18908226