Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures

Standard

Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures. / Błaszczyk, Piotr; Kanovei, Vladimir; Katz, Karin U. et al.

In: Foundations of Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 763-783.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Błaszczyk, P, Kanovei, V, Katz, KU, Katz, MG, Kutateladze, SS & Sherry, D 2017, 'Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures', Foundations of Science, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 763-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3

APA

Błaszczyk, P., Kanovei, V., Katz, K. U., Katz, M. G., Kutateladze, S. S., & Sherry, D. (2017). Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures. Foundations of Science, 22(4), 763-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3

Vancouver

Błaszczyk P, Kanovei V, Katz KU, Katz MG, Kutateladze SS, Sherry D. Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures. Foundations of Science. 2017 Dec 1;22(4):763-783. doi: 10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3

Author

Błaszczyk, Piotr ; Kanovei, Vladimir ; Katz, Karin U. et al. / Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures. In: Foundations of Science. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 763-783.

BibTeX

@article{4a96b86e6f844734b2f4b9a68a41b3cd,

title = "Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures",

abstract = "Abraham Robinson{\textquoteright}s framework for modern infinitesimals was developed half a century ago. It enables a re-evaluation of the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis. Their procedures have been often viewed through the lens of the success of the Weierstrassian foundations. We propose a view without passing through the lens, by means of proxies for such procedures in the modern theory of infinitesimals. The real accomplishments of calculus and analysis had been based primarily on the elaboration of novel techniques for solving problems rather than a quest for ultimate foundations. It may be hopeless to interpret historical foundations in terms of a punctiform continuum, but arguably it is possible to interpret historical techniques and procedures in terms of modern ones. Our proposed formalisations do not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians, but rather indicate that Robinson{\textquoteright}s framework is more helpful in understanding their procedures than a Weierstrassian framework.",

author = "Piotr B{\l}aszczyk and Vladimir Kanovei and Katz, {Karin U.} and Katz, {Mikhail G.} and Kutateladze, {Semen S.} and David Sherry",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

pages = "763--783",

journal = "Foundations of Science",

issn = "1233-1821",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures

AU - Błaszczyk, Piotr

AU - Kanovei, Vladimir

AU - Katz, Karin U.

AU - Katz, Mikhail G.

AU - Kutateladze, Semen S.

AU - Sherry, David

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Abraham Robinson’s framework for modern infinitesimals was developed half a century ago. It enables a re-evaluation of the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis. Their procedures have been often viewed through the lens of the success of the Weierstrassian foundations. We propose a view without passing through the lens, by means of proxies for such procedures in the modern theory of infinitesimals. The real accomplishments of calculus and analysis had been based primarily on the elaboration of novel techniques for solving problems rather than a quest for ultimate foundations. It may be hopeless to interpret historical foundations in terms of a punctiform continuum, but arguably it is possible to interpret historical techniques and procedures in terms of modern ones. Our proposed formalisations do not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians, but rather indicate that Robinson’s framework is more helpful in understanding their procedures than a Weierstrassian framework.

AB - Abraham Robinson’s framework for modern infinitesimals was developed half a century ago. It enables a re-evaluation of the procedures of the pioneers of mathematical analysis. Their procedures have been often viewed through the lens of the success of the Weierstrassian foundations. We propose a view without passing through the lens, by means of proxies for such procedures in the modern theory of infinitesimals. The real accomplishments of calculus and analysis had been based primarily on the elaboration of novel techniques for solving problems rather than a quest for ultimate foundations. It may be hopeless to interpret historical foundations in terms of a punctiform continuum, but arguably it is possible to interpret historical techniques and procedures in terms of modern ones. Our proposed formalisations do not mean that Fermat, Gregory, Leibniz, Euler, and Cauchy were pre-Robinsonians, but rather indicate that Robinson’s framework is more helpful in understanding their procedures than a Weierstrassian framework.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988662718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3

DO - 10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84988662718

VL - 22

SP - 763

EP - 783

JO - Foundations of Science

JF - Foundations of Science

SN - 1233-1821

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 9049056