Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with low back pain is modified by underlying genetic propensity to pain. / Suri, Pradeep; Naeini, Maryam Kazemi; Heagerty, Patrick J. et al.
In: Spine Journal, 01.2024, p. 8-17.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration with low back pain is modified by underlying genetic propensity to pain
AU - Suri, Pradeep
AU - Naeini, Maryam Kazemi
AU - Heagerty, Patrick J.
AU - Freidin, Maxim B.
AU - Smith, Isabelle Granville
AU - Elgaeva, Elizaveta E.
AU - Compte, Roger
AU - Tsepilov, Yakov A.
AU - Williams, Frances M.K.
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups. PURPOSE: To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK. PATIENT SAMPLES: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting ≥1 month (LBP1). METHODS: Using the PRS as a proxy for “genetically-predicted propensity to pain”, we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A “basic” model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A “fully-adjusted” model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms. RESULTS: In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7–3.7], p=2.6×10−6), and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3–3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p≤.05). CONCLUSIONS: Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people.
AB - BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Associations between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration (LDD) and LBP are often of modest magnitude. This association may be larger in specific patient subgroups. PURPOSE: To examine whether the association between LDD and LBP is modified by underlying genetic predispositions to pain. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in UK Biobank (UKB) and Twins UK. PATIENT SAMPLES: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) of the number of anatomical chronic pain locations was conducted in 347,538 UKB participants. The GWAS was used to develop a genome-wide polygenic risk score (PRS) in a holdout sample of 30,000 UKB participants. The PRS model was then used in analyses of 645 TwinsUK participants with standardized LDD MRI assessments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ever having had LBP associated with disability lasting ≥1 month (LBP1). METHODS: Using the PRS as a proxy for “genetically-predicted propensity to pain”, we stratified TwinsUK participants into PRS quartiles. A “basic” model examined the association between an LDD summary score (LSUM) and LBP1, adjusting for covariates. A “fully-adjusted” model also adjusted for PRS quartile and LSUM x PRS quartile interaction terms. RESULTS: In the basic model, the odds ratio (OR) of LBP1 was 1.8 per standard deviation of LSUM (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4–2.3). In the fully-adjusted model, there was a statistically significant LSUM-LBP1 association in quartile 4, the highest PRS quartile (OR=2.5 [95% CI 1.7–3.7], p=2.6×10−6), and in quartile 3 (OR=2.0, [95% CI 1.3–3.0]; p=.002), with small-magnitude and/or nonsignificant associations in the lowest 2 PRS quartiles. PRS quartile was a significant effect modifier of the LSUM-LBP1 association (interaction p≤.05). CONCLUSIONS: Genetically-predicted propensity to pain modifies the LDD-LBP association, with the strongest association present in people with the highest genetic propensity to pain. Lumbar MRI findings may have stronger connections to LBP in specific subgroups of people.
KW - Epidemiology
KW - Genetics
KW - Intervertebral disc
KW - Low back pain
KW - Patient stratification
KW - Polygenic risk score
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/f3118a0a-5af7-3dc3-b157-e8cf7b1414cc/
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85199477844&origin=inward&txGid=5da258ee2ec6394b675b08ed04349adb
UR - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38942297/
U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018
DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 38942297
SP - 8
EP - 17
JO - Spine Journal
JF - Spine Journal
SN - 1529-9430
ER -
ID: 62762081