Standard

Sessile and suspended droplets on a biphilic surface in the presence of natural convection: Experimental studies and modeling. / Tonini, S.; Conti, P.; Cossali, G. E. et al.

In: Physics of Fluids, Vol. 37, No. 3, 033349, 17.03.2025.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Tonini S, Conti P, Cossali GE, Starinskaya EM, Miskiv NB, Rodionov AA et al. Sessile and suspended droplets on a biphilic surface in the presence of natural convection: Experimental studies and modeling. Physics of Fluids. 2025 Mar 17;37(3):033349. doi: 10.1063/5.0260201

Author

Tonini, S. ; Conti, P. ; Cossali, G. E. et al. / Sessile and suspended droplets on a biphilic surface in the presence of natural convection: Experimental studies and modeling. In: Physics of Fluids. 2025 ; Vol. 37, No. 3.

BibTeX

@article{a47f6175e32841e4bcac90e79f288714,
title = "Sessile and suspended droplets on a biphilic surface in the presence of natural convection: Experimental studies and modeling",
abstract = "New experimental and modeling results, referring to heating and evaporation of sessile and pendant water droplet on a biphilic surface, are presented. Two modeling approaches are used: one based on the previously developed variable density model in which the droplet shape in the presence of gravity is described by the Bashforth-Adams equation, and the other based on ANSYS Fluent. It is shown that the results predicted by both approaches almost coincide in the absence of gravity, which can be considered as verification of both approaches. The predictions of both approaches are shown to be close to experimental results for pendant droplets. For sessile droplets, however, both approaches tend to under-predict experimental data. The difference in model predictions, taking and not taking into account the effect of natural convection, is shown not to exceed 3% for the experimental conditions under consideration.",
author = "S. Tonini and P. Conti and Cossali, {G. E.} and Starinskaya, {E. M.} and Miskiv, {N. B.} and Rodionov, {A. A.} and Starinskiy, {S. V.} and Terekhov, {V. V.} and Sazhin, {S. S.}",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1063/5.0260201",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
journal = "Physics of Fluids",
issn = "1070-6631",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sessile and suspended droplets on a biphilic surface in the presence of natural convection: Experimental studies and modeling

AU - Tonini, S.

AU - Conti, P.

AU - Cossali, G. E.

AU - Starinskaya, E. M.

AU - Miskiv, N. B.

AU - Rodionov, A. A.

AU - Starinskiy, S. V.

AU - Terekhov, V. V.

AU - Sazhin, S. S.

PY - 2025/3/17

Y1 - 2025/3/17

N2 - New experimental and modeling results, referring to heating and evaporation of sessile and pendant water droplet on a biphilic surface, are presented. Two modeling approaches are used: one based on the previously developed variable density model in which the droplet shape in the presence of gravity is described by the Bashforth-Adams equation, and the other based on ANSYS Fluent. It is shown that the results predicted by both approaches almost coincide in the absence of gravity, which can be considered as verification of both approaches. The predictions of both approaches are shown to be close to experimental results for pendant droplets. For sessile droplets, however, both approaches tend to under-predict experimental data. The difference in model predictions, taking and not taking into account the effect of natural convection, is shown not to exceed 3% for the experimental conditions under consideration.

AB - New experimental and modeling results, referring to heating and evaporation of sessile and pendant water droplet on a biphilic surface, are presented. Two modeling approaches are used: one based on the previously developed variable density model in which the droplet shape in the presence of gravity is described by the Bashforth-Adams equation, and the other based on ANSYS Fluent. It is shown that the results predicted by both approaches almost coincide in the absence of gravity, which can be considered as verification of both approaches. The predictions of both approaches are shown to be close to experimental results for pendant droplets. For sessile droplets, however, both approaches tend to under-predict experimental data. The difference in model predictions, taking and not taking into account the effect of natural convection, is shown not to exceed 3% for the experimental conditions under consideration.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/728c15bd-9475-3af0-b100-276e65ceac81/

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105000427339&origin=inward&txGid=9796ed8e09a3a0c530185f2c9d1fe941

U2 - 10.1063/5.0260201

DO - 10.1063/5.0260201

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Physics of Fluids

JF - Physics of Fluids

SN - 1070-6631

IS - 3

M1 - 033349

ER -

ID: 65124429