Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations

Standard

Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations. / Parkhomenko, D. V.; Predtechenskaya, E. A.

In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 579, No. 1, 012112, 04.11.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Harvard

Parkhomenko, DV & Predtechenskaya, EA 2020, 'Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations', IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 579, no. 1, 012112. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112

APA

Parkhomenko, D. V., & Predtechenskaya, E. A. (2020). Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 579(1), [012112]. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112

Vancouver

Parkhomenko DV, Predtechenskaya EA. Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020 Nov 4;579(1):012112. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112

Author

Parkhomenko, D. V. ; Predtechenskaya, E. A. / Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020 ; Vol. 579, No. 1.

BibTeX

@article{4e5bec9ab3904e2a86d2fd04c8deea74,

title = "Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations",

abstract = "Geoscience does not investigate the methods of producing land surveyors in the framework of court cases and reviews produced after the analysis of this expertise type. The article proposes the author's methods of this field of study: test, technological methods and method of typical errors, which are developed and justified. The paper analyzes the errors of 176 land surveyors and provides statistics of such errors. They are classified into design errors, procedural errors, and errors of a special technical nature. The article analyzes the meaning of each error type (and introduces the concept of gross and minor errors). It proposes the author's method of producing reviews of land surveyors which is a technological method. It is reviewed in detail; it is indicated that it is in the testing stage and has received a positive response. The study suggests the formation of reliable complete scientific research in the framework of the expertise in land disputes, which leads to more fair and well-grounded court decisions.",

author = "Parkhomenko, {D. V.} and Predtechenskaya, {E. A.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Institute of Physics Publishing. All rights reserved. Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.; 2020 International Symposium on Earth Sciences: History, Contemporary Issues and Prospects, ESHCIP 2020 ; Conference date: 10-03-2020",

year = "2020",

month = nov,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112",

language = "English",

volume = "579",

journal = "IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science",

issn = "1755-1307",

publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd.",

number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodology for conducting and analyzing land surveying examinations

AU - Parkhomenko, D. V.

AU - Predtechenskaya, E. A.

PY - 2020/11/4

Y1 - 2020/11/4

N2 - Geoscience does not investigate the methods of producing land surveyors in the framework of court cases and reviews produced after the analysis of this expertise type. The article proposes the author's methods of this field of study: test, technological methods and method of typical errors, which are developed and justified. The paper analyzes the errors of 176 land surveyors and provides statistics of such errors. They are classified into design errors, procedural errors, and errors of a special technical nature. The article analyzes the meaning of each error type (and introduces the concept of gross and minor errors). It proposes the author's method of producing reviews of land surveyors which is a technological method. It is reviewed in detail; it is indicated that it is in the testing stage and has received a positive response. The study suggests the formation of reliable complete scientific research in the framework of the expertise in land disputes, which leads to more fair and well-grounded court decisions.

AB - Geoscience does not investigate the methods of producing land surveyors in the framework of court cases and reviews produced after the analysis of this expertise type. The article proposes the author's methods of this field of study: test, technological methods and method of typical errors, which are developed and justified. The paper analyzes the errors of 176 land surveyors and provides statistics of such errors. They are classified into design errors, procedural errors, and errors of a special technical nature. The article analyzes the meaning of each error type (and introduces the concept of gross and minor errors). It proposes the author's method of producing reviews of land surveyors which is a technological method. It is reviewed in detail; it is indicated that it is in the testing stage and has received a positive response. The study suggests the formation of reliable complete scientific research in the framework of the expertise in land disputes, which leads to more fair and well-grounded court decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096617847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112

DO - 10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012112

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85096617847

VL - 579

JO - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

JF - IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

SN - 1755-1307

IS - 1

M1 - 012112

T2 - 2020 International Symposium on Earth Sciences: History, Contemporary Issues and Prospects, ESHCIP 2020

Y2 - 10 March 2020

ER -

ID: 27123219