HOW NOT TO DO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY AND HOW IT SHOULD BE CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD (NT Kremliev's "Historical Sociology. Questions of Social Development theory". M., 2016)

Standard

HOW NOT TO DO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY AND HOW IT SHOULD BE CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD (NT Kremliev's "Historical Sociology. Questions of Social Development theory". M., 2016). / Rozov, N. S.

In: Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 2, 2017, p. 161-167.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

BibTeX

@article{8f1aa524c75c44bc934bf5ac68f1c2dc,

title = "HOW NOT TO DO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY AND HOW IT SHOULD BE CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD (NT Kremliev's {"}Historical Sociology. Questions of Social Development theory{"}. M., 2016)",

abstract = "The book by N. Kremliev includes an extensive review of classical and contemporary studies on the social analysis of the past, but it neglects the most important figures. N. Kremliev retells traditional secondary and tertiary historical works on some periods in world history in complete disregard of the actual dispute. The second part of the article deals with the specifics of historical sociology which is defined as the use of sociological approaches to past periods of human history. Historical sociology is a standard part of sociology and includes macrosociology (theoretical history, macrohistory) as its part. The historical material should be subordinated to the tasks of sociological research, structured, laced with ideas, concepts, models of sociological knowledge, preferably modern. The conclusions of research should make contributions to sociological knowledge, somehow supplement or correct existing general ideas about social phenomena, social processes, their nature and causes, not just demonstrate the applicability of the concepts to social phenomena of the past.",

keywords = "historical sociology, macrosociology, methodology of social research, social history, theoretical history, macrohistory, sociological paradigms",

author = "Rozov, {N. S.}",

year = "2017",

language = "не определен",

pages = "161--167",

journal = "Социологические исследования",

issn = "0132-1625",

publisher = "MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - HOW NOT TO DO HISTORICAL SOCIOLOGY AND HOW IT SHOULD BE CORRECTLY UNDERSTOOD (NT Kremliev's "Historical Sociology. Questions of Social Development theory". M., 2016)

AU - Rozov, N. S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The book by N. Kremliev includes an extensive review of classical and contemporary studies on the social analysis of the past, but it neglects the most important figures. N. Kremliev retells traditional secondary and tertiary historical works on some periods in world history in complete disregard of the actual dispute. The second part of the article deals with the specifics of historical sociology which is defined as the use of sociological approaches to past periods of human history. Historical sociology is a standard part of sociology and includes macrosociology (theoretical history, macrohistory) as its part. The historical material should be subordinated to the tasks of sociological research, structured, laced with ideas, concepts, models of sociological knowledge, preferably modern. The conclusions of research should make contributions to sociological knowledge, somehow supplement or correct existing general ideas about social phenomena, social processes, their nature and causes, not just demonstrate the applicability of the concepts to social phenomena of the past.

AB - The book by N. Kremliev includes an extensive review of classical and contemporary studies on the social analysis of the past, but it neglects the most important figures. N. Kremliev retells traditional secondary and tertiary historical works on some periods in world history in complete disregard of the actual dispute. The second part of the article deals with the specifics of historical sociology which is defined as the use of sociological approaches to past periods of human history. Historical sociology is a standard part of sociology and includes macrosociology (theoretical history, macrohistory) as its part. The historical material should be subordinated to the tasks of sociological research, structured, laced with ideas, concepts, models of sociological knowledge, preferably modern. The conclusions of research should make contributions to sociological knowledge, somehow supplement or correct existing general ideas about social phenomena, social processes, their nature and causes, not just demonstrate the applicability of the concepts to social phenomena of the past.

KW - historical sociology

KW - macrosociology

KW - methodology of social research

KW - social history

KW - theoretical history

KW - macrohistory

KW - sociological paradigms

M3 - статья

SP - 161

EP - 167

JO - Социологические исследования

JF - Социологические исследования

SN - 0132-1625

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 18739119