Standard

Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms. / Duchkov, Anton A.; Stefanov, Yury P.; Yaskevich, Sergey.

In: Geofisica Internacional, Vol. 64, No. 2, 01.04.2025, p. 1521-1531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Duchkov AA, Stefanov YP, Yaskevich S. Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms. Geofisica Internacional. 2025 Apr 1;64(2):1521-1531. doi: 10.22201/IGEOF.2954436XE.2025.64.2.1804

Author

BibTeX

@article{9d7eab49e5894ea885e893c94e4f3c5d,
title = "Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms",
abstract = "We present an approach to study the rock failure mechanisms due to fracture growth or activation. Our approach includes a series of numerical geomechanic simulations of an incremental rock failure (fracture growth) accounting for elastic wavefield generation and propagation. We then record these wavefields and perform their seismic moment-tensor inversion. We then try to establish connections between seismic moment-tensor solutions and different geomechanic scenarios of the fracture growth with possible applications in monitoring hydraulic fracturing, reservoir development, and local tectonic stress analysis. Our results show that in most cases the amplitudes of generated P-and S-waves can be reasonably well approximated by a moment-tensor point source. When the fracture hits the pre-existing crack then we observe stronger seismic emission compared to the case of the fracture growth in continuous medium. Thus our geomechanic modeling confirms the concept that the most noticeable microseismicity may come from activating the existing natural fractures rather than from the main fracture growth. We also note that the S-wave radiation pattern may be asymmetric (does not correspond to any ideal moment tensor) radiating more energy forward when the fracture hits long pre-existing cracks. Finally, our examples show that the moment tensors may give misleading idea about the direction of the fracture growth (advancement). This result should be kept in mind when interpreting microseismic data in the hydrofrac monitoring applications.",
keywords = "Microseismic monitoring, geomechanic modeling, hydraulic fracture, seismic momenttensor inversion",
author = "Duchkov, {Anton A.} and Stefanov, {Yury P.} and Sergey Yaskevich",
note = "Yaskevich, S., Stefanov, Y. P., & Duchkov, A. A. (2025). Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms / S. Yaskevich, Y. P. Stefanov, A. A. Duchkov //. Geof{\'i}sica Internacional, 2025. - 64(2). P. 1521–1531. DOI: 10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.2.1804 ",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.22201/IGEOF.2954436XE.2025.64.2.1804",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "1521--1531",
journal = "Geofisica Internacional",
issn = "2954-436X",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms

AU - Duchkov, Anton A.

AU - Stefanov, Yury P.

AU - Yaskevich, Sergey

N1 - Yaskevich, S., Stefanov, Y. P., & Duchkov, A. A. (2025). Geomechanic modeling of seismic emission due to fracture growth - connection to microseismic source mechanisms / S. Yaskevich, Y. P. Stefanov, A. A. Duchkov //. Geofísica Internacional, 2025. - 64(2). P. 1521–1531. DOI: 10.22201/igeof.2954436xe.2025.64.2.1804

PY - 2025/4/1

Y1 - 2025/4/1

N2 - We present an approach to study the rock failure mechanisms due to fracture growth or activation. Our approach includes a series of numerical geomechanic simulations of an incremental rock failure (fracture growth) accounting for elastic wavefield generation and propagation. We then record these wavefields and perform their seismic moment-tensor inversion. We then try to establish connections between seismic moment-tensor solutions and different geomechanic scenarios of the fracture growth with possible applications in monitoring hydraulic fracturing, reservoir development, and local tectonic stress analysis. Our results show that in most cases the amplitudes of generated P-and S-waves can be reasonably well approximated by a moment-tensor point source. When the fracture hits the pre-existing crack then we observe stronger seismic emission compared to the case of the fracture growth in continuous medium. Thus our geomechanic modeling confirms the concept that the most noticeable microseismicity may come from activating the existing natural fractures rather than from the main fracture growth. We also note that the S-wave radiation pattern may be asymmetric (does not correspond to any ideal moment tensor) radiating more energy forward when the fracture hits long pre-existing cracks. Finally, our examples show that the moment tensors may give misleading idea about the direction of the fracture growth (advancement). This result should be kept in mind when interpreting microseismic data in the hydrofrac monitoring applications.

AB - We present an approach to study the rock failure mechanisms due to fracture growth or activation. Our approach includes a series of numerical geomechanic simulations of an incremental rock failure (fracture growth) accounting for elastic wavefield generation and propagation. We then record these wavefields and perform their seismic moment-tensor inversion. We then try to establish connections between seismic moment-tensor solutions and different geomechanic scenarios of the fracture growth with possible applications in monitoring hydraulic fracturing, reservoir development, and local tectonic stress analysis. Our results show that in most cases the amplitudes of generated P-and S-waves can be reasonably well approximated by a moment-tensor point source. When the fracture hits the pre-existing crack then we observe stronger seismic emission compared to the case of the fracture growth in continuous medium. Thus our geomechanic modeling confirms the concept that the most noticeable microseismicity may come from activating the existing natural fractures rather than from the main fracture growth. We also note that the S-wave radiation pattern may be asymmetric (does not correspond to any ideal moment tensor) radiating more energy forward when the fracture hits long pre-existing cracks. Finally, our examples show that the moment tensors may give misleading idea about the direction of the fracture growth (advancement). This result should be kept in mind when interpreting microseismic data in the hydrofrac monitoring applications.

KW - Microseismic monitoring

KW - geomechanic modeling

KW - hydraulic fracture

KW - seismic momenttensor inversion

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/dad24ac3-3c9e-3220-8322-e06e8b7cc67e/

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105002784566&origin=inward

U2 - 10.22201/IGEOF.2954436XE.2025.64.2.1804

DO - 10.22201/IGEOF.2954436XE.2025.64.2.1804

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 1521

EP - 1531

JO - Geofisica Internacional

JF - Geofisica Internacional

SN - 2954-436X

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 65259362