Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Comparative Statistical Analysis of Word Frequencies in Human-Written and AI-Generated Texts. / Kudryavtseva, Anna; Kovalevskii, Artyom.
In: Glottometrics, Vol. 58, 2025, p. 19-34.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Statistical Analysis of Word Frequencies in Human-Written and AI-Generated Texts
AU - Kudryavtseva, Anna
AU - Kovalevskii, Artyom
N1 - Weare grateful to an anonymous reviewer for his remarks that helped us improve the paper. The work is supported by Program of Fundamental Scientific Research of the SB RAS, project FWNF-2022-0010.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - We classify texts using relative word frequencies. The task is to distinguish human-written texts from those generated by a computer using modern algorithms. We study two essay datasets, each containing an equal number of human-written and computer-generated essays. Studying Zipf diagrams shows that the generated texts have a significantly smaller vocabulary compared to human ones. However, the relative frequency of rare words (not included in the 1000 most common) does not allow us to confidently classify the texts. As additional features, we used the relative frequencies of the four most frequent words, as well as the ratio of the number of hapax legomena to the total number of different words. This feature allows to significantly improve the classification. Using these six features allows us to fairly confidently determine whether the text is computer-generated.
AB - We classify texts using relative word frequencies. The task is to distinguish human-written texts from those generated by a computer using modern algorithms. We study two essay datasets, each containing an equal number of human-written and computer-generated essays. Studying Zipf diagrams shows that the generated texts have a significantly smaller vocabulary compared to human ones. However, the relative frequency of rare words (not included in the 1000 most common) does not allow us to confidently classify the texts. As additional features, we used the relative frequencies of the four most frequent words, as well as the ratio of the number of hapax legomena to the total number of different words. This feature allows to significantly improve the classification. Using these six features allows us to fairly confidently determine whether the text is computer-generated.
KW - Large Language Model
KW - Zipf’s Law
KW - rare words
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/0648edcf-baf3-31f8-9e82-7f95b1edc74f/
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=105013211258&origin=inward
U2 - 10.53482/2025_58_423
DO - 10.53482/2025_58_423
M3 - Article
VL - 58
SP - 19
EP - 34
JO - Glottometrics
JF - Glottometrics
SN - 2625-8226
ER -
ID: 68828506