Standard

Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames. / Osipova, K. N.; Sarathy, S. Mani; Korobeinichev, O. P. et al.

In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.2021, p. 2379-2386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Osipova, KN, Sarathy, SM, Korobeinichev, OP & Shmakov, AG 2021, 'Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames', Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 2379-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033

APA

Osipova, K. N., Sarathy, S. M., Korobeinichev, O. P., & Shmakov, A. G. (2021). Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 38(2), 2379-2386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033

Vancouver

Osipova KN, Sarathy SM, Korobeinichev OP, Shmakov AG. Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2021 Jan;38(2):2379-2386. Epub 2020 Jul 28. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033

Author

Osipova, K. N. ; Sarathy, S. Mani ; Korobeinichev, O. P. et al. / Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames. In: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2021 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 2379-2386.

BibTeX

@article{3c5a0e97b92c492bb076cba02c823c0c,
title = "Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames",
abstract = "The work presents an experimental and kinetic modeling study of laminar premixed formic acid [HC(O)OH]/H 2 /O 2 /Ar flames at different equivalence ratios (ϕ= 0.85, 1.1 and 1.3) stabilized on a flat burner at atmospheric pressure, as well as laminar flame speed of HC(O)OH/O 2 /Ar flames (ϕ= 0.5-1.5) at 1 atm. Flame structure as well as laminar flame speed were simulated using three different detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms proposed for formic acid oxidation. The components in the fuel blends show different consumption profiles, namely, hydrogen is consumed slower than formic acid. According to kinetic analysis, the reason of the observed phenomenon is that the studied flames have hydrogen as a fuel but also as an intermediate product formed from HC(O)OH decomposition. Comparison of the measured and simulated flame structure shows that all the mechanisms satisfactorily predict the mole fraction profiles of the reactants, main products, and intermediates. It is noteworthy that the mechanisms proposed by Glarborg et al., Konnov et al. and the updated AramcoMech2.0 adequately predict the spatial variations in the mole fractions of free radicals, such as H, OH O and HO 2. However, some drawbacks of the mechanisms used were identified; in particular, they predict different concentrations of CH 2 O. As for laminar flame speed simulations, the Konnov et al. mechanism predicts around two times higher values than in experiment, while the Glarborg et al. and updated AramcoMech2.0 show good agreement with the experimental data.",
keywords = "Flame structure, Formic acid, Hydrogen, Laminar flame speed, Molecular-beam mass spectrometry",
author = "Osipova, {K. N.} and Sarathy, {S. Mani} and Korobeinichev, {O. P.} and Shmakov, {A. G.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020",
year = "2021",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "2379--2386",
journal = "Proceedings of the Combustion Institute",
issn = "1540-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chemical structure of atmospheric pressure premixed laminar formic acid/hydrogen flames

AU - Osipova, K. N.

AU - Sarathy, S. Mani

AU - Korobeinichev, O. P.

AU - Shmakov, A. G.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020

PY - 2021/1

Y1 - 2021/1

N2 - The work presents an experimental and kinetic modeling study of laminar premixed formic acid [HC(O)OH]/H 2 /O 2 /Ar flames at different equivalence ratios (ϕ= 0.85, 1.1 and 1.3) stabilized on a flat burner at atmospheric pressure, as well as laminar flame speed of HC(O)OH/O 2 /Ar flames (ϕ= 0.5-1.5) at 1 atm. Flame structure as well as laminar flame speed were simulated using three different detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms proposed for formic acid oxidation. The components in the fuel blends show different consumption profiles, namely, hydrogen is consumed slower than formic acid. According to kinetic analysis, the reason of the observed phenomenon is that the studied flames have hydrogen as a fuel but also as an intermediate product formed from HC(O)OH decomposition. Comparison of the measured and simulated flame structure shows that all the mechanisms satisfactorily predict the mole fraction profiles of the reactants, main products, and intermediates. It is noteworthy that the mechanisms proposed by Glarborg et al., Konnov et al. and the updated AramcoMech2.0 adequately predict the spatial variations in the mole fractions of free radicals, such as H, OH O and HO 2. However, some drawbacks of the mechanisms used were identified; in particular, they predict different concentrations of CH 2 O. As for laminar flame speed simulations, the Konnov et al. mechanism predicts around two times higher values than in experiment, while the Glarborg et al. and updated AramcoMech2.0 show good agreement with the experimental data.

AB - The work presents an experimental and kinetic modeling study of laminar premixed formic acid [HC(O)OH]/H 2 /O 2 /Ar flames at different equivalence ratios (ϕ= 0.85, 1.1 and 1.3) stabilized on a flat burner at atmospheric pressure, as well as laminar flame speed of HC(O)OH/O 2 /Ar flames (ϕ= 0.5-1.5) at 1 atm. Flame structure as well as laminar flame speed were simulated using three different detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms proposed for formic acid oxidation. The components in the fuel blends show different consumption profiles, namely, hydrogen is consumed slower than formic acid. According to kinetic analysis, the reason of the observed phenomenon is that the studied flames have hydrogen as a fuel but also as an intermediate product formed from HC(O)OH decomposition. Comparison of the measured and simulated flame structure shows that all the mechanisms satisfactorily predict the mole fraction profiles of the reactants, main products, and intermediates. It is noteworthy that the mechanisms proposed by Glarborg et al., Konnov et al. and the updated AramcoMech2.0 adequately predict the spatial variations in the mole fractions of free radicals, such as H, OH O and HO 2. However, some drawbacks of the mechanisms used were identified; in particular, they predict different concentrations of CH 2 O. As for laminar flame speed simulations, the Konnov et al. mechanism predicts around two times higher values than in experiment, while the Glarborg et al. and updated AramcoMech2.0 show good agreement with the experimental data.

KW - Flame structure

KW - Formic acid

KW - Hydrogen

KW - Laminar flame speed

KW - Molecular-beam mass spectrometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089486104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033

DO - 10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.033

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85089486104

VL - 38

SP - 2379

EP - 2386

JO - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

JF - Proceedings of the Combustion Institute

SN - 1540-7489

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 25059178