Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Catalytic Steam Cracking of Heavy Oil Feedstocks : A Review. / Eletskii, P. M.; Mironenko, O. O.; Kukushkin, R. G. et al.
In: Catalysis in Industry, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.07.2018, p. 185-201.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Catalytic Steam Cracking of Heavy Oil Feedstocks
T2 - A Review
AU - Eletskii, P. M.
AU - Mironenko, O. O.
AU - Kukushkin, R. G.
AU - Sosnin, G. A.
AU - Yakovlev, V. A.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Abstract: In view of the worsening quality of crude oil, the use of unconventional petroleum feedstocks (heavy oils, bitumens, residues, etc.) in processing is becoming increasingly important. The processing of heavy oil feedstocks (HOF) requires the development of new effective techniques that will lead to an increase in the yield of light fractions, suppression of coke formation, and saturation of liquid products with hydrogen. At the same time, the capital and operating costs of the process should be minimized because the cost of production and transportation for HOF is several times higher than for light and middle oils. The present review summarizes the results of studies of the catalytic steam cracking of HOF—a potential alternative to conventional HOF upgrading based on carbon rejection (thermal cracking, visbreaking, catalytic cracking) or hydrogen addition (hydrocracking). The main differences of this process from HOF upgrading with water (aqueous pyrolysis in sub- or supercritical water), the peculiarities of the catalytic steam cracking depending on the process conditions and the type of catalyst, and possible mechanisms of water participation in the process were discussed.
AB - Abstract: In view of the worsening quality of crude oil, the use of unconventional petroleum feedstocks (heavy oils, bitumens, residues, etc.) in processing is becoming increasingly important. The processing of heavy oil feedstocks (HOF) requires the development of new effective techniques that will lead to an increase in the yield of light fractions, suppression of coke formation, and saturation of liquid products with hydrogen. At the same time, the capital and operating costs of the process should be minimized because the cost of production and transportation for HOF is several times higher than for light and middle oils. The present review summarizes the results of studies of the catalytic steam cracking of HOF—a potential alternative to conventional HOF upgrading based on carbon rejection (thermal cracking, visbreaking, catalytic cracking) or hydrogen addition (hydrocracking). The main differences of this process from HOF upgrading with water (aqueous pyrolysis in sub- or supercritical water), the peculiarities of the catalytic steam cracking depending on the process conditions and the type of catalyst, and possible mechanisms of water participation in the process were discussed.
KW - bitumen
KW - catalytic steam cracking
KW - hydrovisbreaking
KW - oxidative cracking
KW - steam reforming
KW - superheated steam
KW - upgrading of heavy oil feedstock
KW - vacuum residue
KW - VACUUM RESIDUE
KW - LIGHTER FUELS
KW - SUPERCRITICAL WATER
KW - CRUDE-OIL
KW - AROMATIC-COMPOUNDS
KW - USEFUL HYDROCARBONS
KW - IRON-OXIDE CATALYST
KW - PETROLEUM RESIDUAL OIL
KW - COKE FORMATION
KW - OXIDATIVE CRACKING
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054806526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1134/S2070050418030042
DO - 10.1134/S2070050418030042
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85054806526
VL - 10
SP - 185
EP - 201
JO - Catalysis in Industry
JF - Catalysis in Industry
SN - 2070-0504
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 17119124