Standard

Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations. / Plotnikov, Dmitry.

The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War. Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2021. p. 127-140 (The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Plotnikov, D 2021, Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations. in The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War. The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War, Taylor and Francis Ltd., pp. 127-140. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429265983-10

APA

Plotnikov, D. (2021). Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations. In The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War (pp. 127-140). (The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War). Taylor and Francis Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429265983-10

Vancouver

Plotnikov D. Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations. In The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2021. p. 127-140. (The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War). doi: 10.4324/9780429265983-10

Author

Plotnikov, Dmitry. / Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations. The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War. Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2021. pp. 127-140 (The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War).

BibTeX

@inbook{c05e94a3155746e3b2f251a1a300f3a5,
title = "Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations",
abstract = "While secondary in importance and often overshadowed by the events in the Crimea, the Caucasus theatre of operations offers a wealth of knowledge to anyone studying the Crimean War from a military perspective. Eastern Anatolia was the only region where Russian forces proved decisively victorious and the Separate Corps of the Caucasus was the only part of the Russian army that successfully took the offensive and achieved important victories. In Nicholas I's army, where initiative was scarce and freedom of action was frowned upon, the veterans of the Caucasus, hardened in the protracted guerrilla war against the Caucasus mountaineers, were a rare example of initiative and independent decision-making. In a mountainous region with poor communications and a distinctly separate operational axis, this ability to seize the initiative gave the Corps a decisive advantage against the Ottoman Anatolian Army plagued with chronic issues in command and control. While the victories in the Caucasus only partially compensated Russian defeats elsewhere, the effective implementation of mission command on the operational level was an early sign of the new developments in the art of war, which the Prussian armies would later demonstrate on a grander scale in the Wars of German Unification.",
author = "Dmitry Plotnikov",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.4324/9780429265983-10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780429556494",
series = "The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
pages = "127--140",
booktitle = "The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Battles and military art in the Caucasian theatre of operations

AU - Plotnikov, Dmitry

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - While secondary in importance and often overshadowed by the events in the Crimea, the Caucasus theatre of operations offers a wealth of knowledge to anyone studying the Crimean War from a military perspective. Eastern Anatolia was the only region where Russian forces proved decisively victorious and the Separate Corps of the Caucasus was the only part of the Russian army that successfully took the offensive and achieved important victories. In Nicholas I's army, where initiative was scarce and freedom of action was frowned upon, the veterans of the Caucasus, hardened in the protracted guerrilla war against the Caucasus mountaineers, were a rare example of initiative and independent decision-making. In a mountainous region with poor communications and a distinctly separate operational axis, this ability to seize the initiative gave the Corps a decisive advantage against the Ottoman Anatolian Army plagued with chronic issues in command and control. While the victories in the Caucasus only partially compensated Russian defeats elsewhere, the effective implementation of mission command on the operational level was an early sign of the new developments in the art of war, which the Prussian armies would later demonstrate on a grander scale in the Wars of German Unification.

AB - While secondary in importance and often overshadowed by the events in the Crimea, the Caucasus theatre of operations offers a wealth of knowledge to anyone studying the Crimean War from a military perspective. Eastern Anatolia was the only region where Russian forces proved decisively victorious and the Separate Corps of the Caucasus was the only part of the Russian army that successfully took the offensive and achieved important victories. In Nicholas I's army, where initiative was scarce and freedom of action was frowned upon, the veterans of the Caucasus, hardened in the protracted guerrilla war against the Caucasus mountaineers, were a rare example of initiative and independent decision-making. In a mountainous region with poor communications and a distinctly separate operational axis, this ability to seize the initiative gave the Corps a decisive advantage against the Ottoman Anatolian Army plagued with chronic issues in command and control. While the victories in the Caucasus only partially compensated Russian defeats elsewhere, the effective implementation of mission command on the operational level was an early sign of the new developments in the art of war, which the Prussian armies would later demonstrate on a grander scale in the Wars of German Unification.

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2f8f2b65-4682-3fa5-b58e-8d3db50ac8ef/

U2 - 10.4324/9780429265983-10

DO - 10.4324/9780429265983-10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780429556494

T3 - The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War

SP - 127

EP - 140

BT - The Routledge Handbook of the Crimean War

PB - Taylor and Francis Ltd.

ER -

ID: 71477578