Standard

Actional sentences in the Khanty and Nenets languages : Semantics and metaphorization ways. / Koshkareva, N. B.

In: Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, No. 4, 12.2019, p. 267-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Koshkareva NB. Actional sentences in the Khanty and Nenets languages: Semantics and metaphorization ways. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal. 2019 Dec;(4):267-280. doi: 10.17223/18137083/69/23

Author

BibTeX

@article{03ad997834a349beaa73449c35b284b3,
title = "Actional sentences in the Khanty and Nenets languages: Semantics and metaphorization ways",
abstract = "The semantic core of actional sentences is the relationship of purposeful influence on the object by the active, controlling subject. The impact is carried out in the physical sphere and represents the causation of the existence or non-existence of the object, as well as the causation of the transition from one state to another. Hence, there are two semantic types of actional sentences creative and destructive action, on the one hand, and the transformation of the object, on the other. The complex of causal-aspectual relations is superimposed on the elementary meanings of existence and state. The following lines of metaphorical transfers are identified, with the physical sphere being the starting point: 1) figurative values, resulting in a system of polysemants - elementary simple sentences with semantics derived from the original one - based on actional typical syntactic structure:  sentences of possession; the transfer direction: physical sphere → social sphere (only for the Khanty language); the figurative meaning is determined by the semantics of the predicate t{\u a}jti {\textquoteleft}to have{\textquoteright}, in which the active role of the agent is reduced, possession does not imply a direct impact on the object;  characterization sentences with the verb t{\u a}jti {\textquoteleft}to have{\textquoteright}; the transfer direction: impact in the physical sphere → characterization in the physical sphere; in partitive subject-object relations, there is one more obligatory component - an adjective accompanying the object position; such sentences are expressive syntactic synonyms of characterization sentences with an adjectival predicate; 2) the transfer of meaning from the physical sphere to the mental and intellectual ones, with syntactic homonyms being formed - non-elementary simple and polypredicative constructions with modus-dictum relations (constructions with sentential predicates). The position of the object is replaced either by the names of abstract semantics, or by words representing the reduced propositions, or by predicative actants. The criterion for classifying these sentences as homonyms is their non-elementary semantics",
keywords = "Khanty language, Nenets language, elementary simple sentence, syntax of the model structure, actional sentences, the subject-object relationship, syntactic metaphor, synonymy, polysemy, homonymy, Actional sentences, Elementary simple sentence, Homonymy, Khanty language, Nenets language, Polysemy, Synonymy, Syntactic metaphor, Syntax of the model structure, The subject-object relationship",
author = "Koshkareva, {N. B.}",
note = "Кошкарева Н.Б. Акциональные предложения в хантыйском и ненецком языках: семантика и пути метафоризации // Сибирский филологический журнал. - 2019. - № 4. - С. 267-280",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
doi = "10.17223/18137083/69/23",
language = "English",
pages = "267--280",
journal = "Сибирский филологический журнал",
issn = "1813-7083",
publisher = "Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philology",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actional sentences in the Khanty and Nenets languages

T2 - Semantics and metaphorization ways

AU - Koshkareva, N. B.

N1 - Кошкарева Н.Б. Акциональные предложения в хантыйском и ненецком языках: семантика и пути метафоризации // Сибирский филологический журнал. - 2019. - № 4. - С. 267-280

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - The semantic core of actional sentences is the relationship of purposeful influence on the object by the active, controlling subject. The impact is carried out in the physical sphere and represents the causation of the existence or non-existence of the object, as well as the causation of the transition from one state to another. Hence, there are two semantic types of actional sentences creative and destructive action, on the one hand, and the transformation of the object, on the other. The complex of causal-aspectual relations is superimposed on the elementary meanings of existence and state. The following lines of metaphorical transfers are identified, with the physical sphere being the starting point: 1) figurative values, resulting in a system of polysemants - elementary simple sentences with semantics derived from the original one - based on actional typical syntactic structure:  sentences of possession; the transfer direction: physical sphere → social sphere (only for the Khanty language); the figurative meaning is determined by the semantics of the predicate tăjti ‘to have’, in which the active role of the agent is reduced, possession does not imply a direct impact on the object;  characterization sentences with the verb tăjti ‘to have’; the transfer direction: impact in the physical sphere → characterization in the physical sphere; in partitive subject-object relations, there is one more obligatory component - an adjective accompanying the object position; such sentences are expressive syntactic synonyms of characterization sentences with an adjectival predicate; 2) the transfer of meaning from the physical sphere to the mental and intellectual ones, with syntactic homonyms being formed - non-elementary simple and polypredicative constructions with modus-dictum relations (constructions with sentential predicates). The position of the object is replaced either by the names of abstract semantics, or by words representing the reduced propositions, or by predicative actants. The criterion for classifying these sentences as homonyms is their non-elementary semantics

AB - The semantic core of actional sentences is the relationship of purposeful influence on the object by the active, controlling subject. The impact is carried out in the physical sphere and represents the causation of the existence or non-existence of the object, as well as the causation of the transition from one state to another. Hence, there are two semantic types of actional sentences creative and destructive action, on the one hand, and the transformation of the object, on the other. The complex of causal-aspectual relations is superimposed on the elementary meanings of existence and state. The following lines of metaphorical transfers are identified, with the physical sphere being the starting point: 1) figurative values, resulting in a system of polysemants - elementary simple sentences with semantics derived from the original one - based on actional typical syntactic structure:  sentences of possession; the transfer direction: physical sphere → social sphere (only for the Khanty language); the figurative meaning is determined by the semantics of the predicate tăjti ‘to have’, in which the active role of the agent is reduced, possession does not imply a direct impact on the object;  characterization sentences with the verb tăjti ‘to have’; the transfer direction: impact in the physical sphere → characterization in the physical sphere; in partitive subject-object relations, there is one more obligatory component - an adjective accompanying the object position; such sentences are expressive syntactic synonyms of characterization sentences with an adjectival predicate; 2) the transfer of meaning from the physical sphere to the mental and intellectual ones, with syntactic homonyms being formed - non-elementary simple and polypredicative constructions with modus-dictum relations (constructions with sentential predicates). The position of the object is replaced either by the names of abstract semantics, or by words representing the reduced propositions, or by predicative actants. The criterion for classifying these sentences as homonyms is their non-elementary semantics

KW - Khanty language

KW - Nenets language

KW - elementary simple sentence

KW - syntax of the model structure

KW - actional sentences

KW - the subject-object relationship

KW - syntactic metaphor

KW - synonymy

KW - polysemy

KW - homonymy

KW - Actional sentences

KW - Elementary simple sentence

KW - Homonymy

KW - Khanty language

KW - Nenets language

KW - Polysemy

KW - Synonymy

KW - Syntactic metaphor

KW - Syntax of the model structure

KW - The subject-object relationship

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085102465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41473096

U2 - 10.17223/18137083/69/23

DO - 10.17223/18137083/69/23

M3 - Review article

SP - 267

EP - 280

JO - Сибирский филологический журнал

JF - Сибирский филологический журнал

SN - 1813-7083

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 24298634