Standard

«Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016). / Chindina, Lyudmila A.; Molodin, Vyacheslav I.; Rykun, Marina P. et al.

In: Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, No. 4, 2016, p. 167-172.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Chindina, LA, Molodin, VI, Rykun, MP & Chernaya, MP 2016, '«Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016)', Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, no. 4, pp. 167-172. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/42/31

APA

Chindina, L. A., Molodin, V. I., Rykun, M. P., & Chernaya, M. P. (2016). «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016). Вестник Томского государственного университета. История, (4), 167-172. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/42/31

Vancouver

Chindina LA, Molodin VI, Rykun MP, Chernaya MP. «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016). Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2016;(4):167-172. doi: 10.17223/19988613/42/31

Author

Chindina, Lyudmila A. ; Molodin, Vyacheslav I. ; Rykun, Marina P. et al. / «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016). In: Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2016 ; No. 4. pp. 167-172.

BibTeX

@article{f1067c638679472b831d2f1d77b9565c,
title = "«Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016)",
abstract = "The article is dedicated to the analysis of the heritage and foundations of the methodological research on ethnic and cultural history of the Ural and Siberian peoples by the prominent scientist V.N. Chernetsov. There is a brief overview of the researcher's way to humanitarian scientific sphere; unknown facts of his life are given. The main directions and milestones of his scientific activity are shown. The first direction was the conduction of numerous archaeological and ethnographic expeditions in the forest regions of Western Siberian Arctic, Ural and Trans-Ural, Lower Ob-river and Lower Irtysh-river basins. The second was the creation of strong generalizing territorial and chronological scheme of the cultural and historical development of Ural and Siberian peoples from the Neolith to the Middle Ages. He set priorities for Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures, considering them as the basis for Ugric peoples of Western Siberia (Khanty, Mansi, partly Hungarians). Detecting ethnic and cultural areas the scientist considered them as large ethnic and linguistic communities (the Ugric, Samoyed and Paleoasian ones). He had been most consistently elaborating the Ugric constituent of the cultural and historical processes. Methodologically the researcher started from the paleoethnologic school of the Russian science. He considered culture as the main object of study and as a dynamic diverse system developing under the effect of natural and social environment. The main V.N. Chernetsov's principles of scientific work were historicity, interdisciplinary (including physical anthropology, archaeology, ethnography, linguistics and geography) approach, system analysis of historical and cultural processes, cultures and communities. His basic method was the comparative-historical one, which includes detection of ethnic and cultural specifics in ornamental designs, art activity (bronze molding, bone and clay sculpture, specifity in construction, technology, artifacts, dressing etc.). The most important culture defining sign perceived by him were ornamental designs as the semantic indicator passing from generation to generation and becoming a tradition. Basing upon genetic and retrospective analysis the researcher studied the dynamics of ethic and cultural development. Methodological approaches of Valery N. Chernetsov have not lost their actuality, in spite of revision of a number of specific historical hypotheses (chronology and ethnic attribution of Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures at Zelyonaya Gora stage)",
author = "Chindina, {Lyudmila A.} and Molodin, {Vyacheslav I.} and Rykun, {Marina P.} and Chernaya, {Maria P.}",
note = "Молодин В.И., Чиндина Л.А., Рыкун М.П., Чёрная М.П. «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016) // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. История. - 2016. - № 4 (42). - С. 167-172",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.17223/19988613/42/31",
language = "русский",
pages = "167--172",
journal = "Вестник Томского государственного университета. История",
issn = "1998-8613",
publisher = "Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования {"}Национальный исследовательский Томский государственный университет{"}",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016)

AU - Chindina, Lyudmila A.

AU - Molodin, Vyacheslav I.

AU - Rykun, Marina P.

AU - Chernaya, Maria P.

N1 - Молодин В.И., Чиндина Л.А., Рыкун М.П., Чёрная М.П. «Всем нашим встречам разлуки, увы, суждены...». Памяти Леонида Теодоровича Яблонского (1950-2016) // Вестн. Том. гос. ун-та. История. - 2016. - № 4 (42). - С. 167-172

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The article is dedicated to the analysis of the heritage and foundations of the methodological research on ethnic and cultural history of the Ural and Siberian peoples by the prominent scientist V.N. Chernetsov. There is a brief overview of the researcher's way to humanitarian scientific sphere; unknown facts of his life are given. The main directions and milestones of his scientific activity are shown. The first direction was the conduction of numerous archaeological and ethnographic expeditions in the forest regions of Western Siberian Arctic, Ural and Trans-Ural, Lower Ob-river and Lower Irtysh-river basins. The second was the creation of strong generalizing territorial and chronological scheme of the cultural and historical development of Ural and Siberian peoples from the Neolith to the Middle Ages. He set priorities for Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures, considering them as the basis for Ugric peoples of Western Siberia (Khanty, Mansi, partly Hungarians). Detecting ethnic and cultural areas the scientist considered them as large ethnic and linguistic communities (the Ugric, Samoyed and Paleoasian ones). He had been most consistently elaborating the Ugric constituent of the cultural and historical processes. Methodologically the researcher started from the paleoethnologic school of the Russian science. He considered culture as the main object of study and as a dynamic diverse system developing under the effect of natural and social environment. The main V.N. Chernetsov's principles of scientific work were historicity, interdisciplinary (including physical anthropology, archaeology, ethnography, linguistics and geography) approach, system analysis of historical and cultural processes, cultures and communities. His basic method was the comparative-historical one, which includes detection of ethnic and cultural specifics in ornamental designs, art activity (bronze molding, bone and clay sculpture, specifity in construction, technology, artifacts, dressing etc.). The most important culture defining sign perceived by him were ornamental designs as the semantic indicator passing from generation to generation and becoming a tradition. Basing upon genetic and retrospective analysis the researcher studied the dynamics of ethic and cultural development. Methodological approaches of Valery N. Chernetsov have not lost their actuality, in spite of revision of a number of specific historical hypotheses (chronology and ethnic attribution of Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures at Zelyonaya Gora stage)

AB - The article is dedicated to the analysis of the heritage and foundations of the methodological research on ethnic and cultural history of the Ural and Siberian peoples by the prominent scientist V.N. Chernetsov. There is a brief overview of the researcher's way to humanitarian scientific sphere; unknown facts of his life are given. The main directions and milestones of his scientific activity are shown. The first direction was the conduction of numerous archaeological and ethnographic expeditions in the forest regions of Western Siberian Arctic, Ural and Trans-Ural, Lower Ob-river and Lower Irtysh-river basins. The second was the creation of strong generalizing territorial and chronological scheme of the cultural and historical development of Ural and Siberian peoples from the Neolith to the Middle Ages. He set priorities for Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures, considering them as the basis for Ugric peoples of Western Siberia (Khanty, Mansi, partly Hungarians). Detecting ethnic and cultural areas the scientist considered them as large ethnic and linguistic communities (the Ugric, Samoyed and Paleoasian ones). He had been most consistently elaborating the Ugric constituent of the cultural and historical processes. Methodologically the researcher started from the paleoethnologic school of the Russian science. He considered culture as the main object of study and as a dynamic diverse system developing under the effect of natural and social environment. The main V.N. Chernetsov's principles of scientific work were historicity, interdisciplinary (including physical anthropology, archaeology, ethnography, linguistics and geography) approach, system analysis of historical and cultural processes, cultures and communities. His basic method was the comparative-historical one, which includes detection of ethnic and cultural specifics in ornamental designs, art activity (bronze molding, bone and clay sculpture, specifity in construction, technology, artifacts, dressing etc.). The most important culture defining sign perceived by him were ornamental designs as the semantic indicator passing from generation to generation and becoming a tradition. Basing upon genetic and retrospective analysis the researcher studied the dynamics of ethic and cultural development. Methodological approaches of Valery N. Chernetsov have not lost their actuality, in spite of revision of a number of specific historical hypotheses (chronology and ethnic attribution of Ust-Poluy and Potchevash cultures at Zelyonaya Gora stage)

UR - https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26674674

U2 - 10.17223/19988613/42/31

DO - 10.17223/19988613/42/31

M3 - статья

SP - 167

EP - 172

JO - Вестник Томского государственного университета. История

JF - Вестник Томского государственного университета. История

SN - 1998-8613

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 25388542