Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Деколонизация юга Африки в свете концепции коллегиально разделенной власти : Decolonization of Southern Africa in Light of Collegially Shared Power Conception. / Savelyev, Dmitriy.
In: Russian Sociological Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2025, p. 132-156.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Деколонизация юга Африки в свете концепции коллегиально разделенной власти
T2 - Decolonization of Southern Africa in Light of Collegially Shared Power Conception
AU - Savelyev, Dmitriy
N1 - Савельев Д. Б. Деколонизация юга Африки в свете концепции коллегиально разделенной власти / Д. Б. Савельев // Социологическое обозрение, 2025. - № 24(1). - С. 132-156. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2025-1-132-156
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The formation model of collegially shared power (CSP) through the emergence of internal political forces parity in the conditions of common external geopolitical threats is tested on the material of Southern African countries in the Gnd half of the GNth century. The approach itself is based on the ‘geopolitical theory of collegial power’ by the American sociologist R. Collins, which describes the processes of formation of new political systems with ‘checks and balances’ through the centralization of military coalitions. A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of decolonization cases in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Lesotho and Swaziland is conducted on L dependent variables: presence/absence of coalition governments, intra-elite repression, government accountability to parliament and the right of the head of state to appoint members of parliament. Decolonization is interpreted as a transition to ‘black majority rule’ in which the population of a country has the ability, at least nominally, to approve and remove governments through general elections. The results of the analysis show that the previously derived model does not fully describe the cases under study, but, with the exception of the Botswana case, the emergence of domestic political forces parity during decolonization does correlate with high levels of CSP. It also reveals that the theory of CSP should take into account the experience of political systems with a dominant party. It is concluded that the analysis of the new sampling allowed both to partially conPrm the results obtained earlier and to reveal certain limitations of the ‘geopolitical theory of collegial power’.
AB - The formation model of collegially shared power (CSP) through the emergence of internal political forces parity in the conditions of common external geopolitical threats is tested on the material of Southern African countries in the Gnd half of the GNth century. The approach itself is based on the ‘geopolitical theory of collegial power’ by the American sociologist R. Collins, which describes the processes of formation of new political systems with ‘checks and balances’ through the centralization of military coalitions. A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of decolonization cases in Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Lesotho and Swaziland is conducted on L dependent variables: presence/absence of coalition governments, intra-elite repression, government accountability to parliament and the right of the head of state to appoint members of parliament. Decolonization is interpreted as a transition to ‘black majority rule’ in which the population of a country has the ability, at least nominally, to approve and remove governments through general elections. The results of the analysis show that the previously derived model does not fully describe the cases under study, but, with the exception of the Botswana case, the emergence of domestic political forces parity during decolonization does correlate with high levels of CSP. It also reveals that the theory of CSP should take into account the experience of political systems with a dominant party. It is concluded that the analysis of the new sampling allowed both to partially conPrm the results obtained earlier and to reveal certain limitations of the ‘geopolitical theory of collegial power’.
KW - деколонизация
KW - демо кратизация
KW - каче ственный сравнительный анализ
KW - коллегиально разделенная власть
KW - политические режимы
KW - разделение властей
KW - транзитология
KW - юг Африки
KW - Southern Africa
KW - collegially shared power
KW - decolonization
KW - democratization
KW - political regimes
KW - qualitative comparative analysis
KW - separation of powers
KW - transitology
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/62747d0a-019c-35a7-8204-2f2fc8697a65/
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105003169292&origin=inward&txGid=d062b11a1bd895d61190b3a87792ebf5
U2 - 10.17323/1728-192X-2025-1-132-156
DO - 10.17323/1728-192X-2025-1-132-156
M3 - статья
VL - 24
SP - 132
EP - 156
JO - Russian Sociological Review
JF - Russian Sociological Review
SN - 1728-1938
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 65643102