Physicotechnical Section - Research output › Research Explorer

1041 - 1050 out of 1,217Page size: 10

10
20
50
100

Sort by: Title

Erratum to: Updated measurement of time-dependent C P -violating observables in B s 0 → J / ψ K + K - decays (The European Physical Journal C, (2019), 79, 8, (706), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7159-8)
The LHCb Collaboration, 1 Jul 2020, In: European Physical Journal C. 80, 7, 601.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurement of light-by-light scattering and search for axion-like particles with 2.2 nb⁻¹ of Pb+Pb data with the ATLAS detector (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2021), 2021, 3, (243), 10.1007/JHEP03(2021)243)
The ATLAS collaboration, Nov 2021, In: Journal of High Energy Physics. 2021, 11, 50.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurement of ϒ production in pp collisions at s = 13 TeV (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2018), 2018, 7, (134), 10.1007/JHEP07(2018)134)
The LHCb Collaboration, Кроковный, П. П. & Воробьев, В. С., 1 May 2019, In: Journal of High Energy Physics. 2019, 5, 7 p., 76.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurement of the W boson polarisation in t t ¯ events from pp collisions at √ s = 8 TeV in the lepton + jets channel with ATLAS (The European Physical Journal C, (2017), 77, 4, (264), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4819-4)
The ATLAS collaboration, Бобровников, В. С., Bogdanchikov, A. G. & Король, А. А., 1 Jan 2019, In: European Physical Journal C. 79, 1, p. 19 19.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Higgs boson production cross-section measurements and their EFT interpretation in the 4 ℓ decay channel at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2020), 80, 10, (957), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8227-9)
The ATLAS collaboration & Bogdanchikov, A. G., May 2021, In: European Physical Journal C. 81, 5, 398.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurements of top-quark pair differential and double-differential cross-sections in the ℓ +jets channel with pp collisions at s = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector [Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 1028] (The European Physical Journal C, (2019), 79, 12, (1028), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7525-6)
The ATLAS collaboration, Nov 2020, In: European Physical Journal C. 80, 11, 23 p., 1092.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurement of the W-boson mass in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2018), 78, 2, (110), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5475-4)
The ATLAS collaboration, 1 Nov 2018, In: European Physical Journal C. 78, 11, 898.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Search for the HH → bb¯ bb¯ process via vector-boson fusion production using proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector (Journal of High Energy Physics, (2020), 2020, 7, (108), 10.1007/JHEP07(2020)108)
The ATLAS collaboration & Bogdanchikov, A. G., Jan 2021, In: Journal of High Energy Physics. 2021, 1, 145.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurement of the J/ψ pair production cross-section in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV (J. High Energ. Phys, (2017), 2017, 47, 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)047)
The LHCb Collaboration, 1 Oct 2017, In: Journal of High Energy Physics. 2017, 10, 9 p., 68.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review
Erratum to: Measurements of W and Z boson production in pp collisions at s = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector (The European Physical Journal C, (2019), 79, 2, (128), 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6622-x)
The ATLAS collaboration, Балдин, Е. М., Бобровников, В. С., Харламов, А. Г., Бузыкаев, А. Р., Харламов, А. Г., Масленников, А. Л., Пелеганчук, С. В., Талышев, А. А. & Тихонов, Ю. А., 1 May 2019, In: European Physical Journal C. 79, 5, 15 p., 374.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Previous 1...101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 ...122 Next

ID: 3081178